
@HarryStebbings
🎤 @twentyminutevc, 🏦 @20vcfund, @projecteurope_😇 @fuseenergy @linear @wearelegora @factoryai @lovable @airwallex @mercor_ai @workos @fomo @fireworksAI_HQ
You need $500,000 a year as a salary just to live in San Francisco today! “Rents in the mediocre apartments in Dogpatch are $10,000 a month now. If it’s $10,000 a month to rent a one-bedroom at The Avalon, how much do you have to make to feel rich? A lot. You need $240K in California pre-tax just to pay the rent. You probably need $480K to feel good about yourself.” @jasonlk Love to hear your thoughts @kimmaicutler @garrytan @lessin @Noahpinion
Harry Stebbings@HarryStebbings·If you do not listen to this weekly show, you are deliberately choosing to not make yourself smarter. The world of tech has never moved faster. You need to stay up to date with the most thoughtful analysis. That is where @rodriscoll and @jasonlk come in! 😉 On the agenda this week: - NVIDIA Bonanza: Buys Poolside & Invests in Mercor and Perplexity - Anthropic's $30TRN Revenue Assumption & OpenAI Confirms IPO - Why Customer Service, Defence and Robotics are Overinflated My notes below 1. We Are So Much More Addicted to Tokens Than We Think As employees adopt 10 to 20 sub-agents running around the clock, businesses are facing unexpected $20,000 per-employee token bills. This is not a temporary trend. Token consumption is becoming an irreversible dependency, with top talent increasingly viewing continuous access to AI compute as essential to doing their jobs. 2. Why Customer Support Is Dead as a Category Standalone customer support software is collapsing as agentic interfaces merge siloed tools into unified workflows. Legacy CS and CX platforms risk becoming cheap commodities as support capabilities are absorbed into cross-functional sales, marketing, and operational agents. 3. Why AI Services Companies Are a Bullshit Category Funding traditional law or accounting firms rebranded as AI services companies relies on convoluted structures that look great on spreadsheets but break down in execution. Premium tech multiples cannot be created simply by wrapping overworked elite graduates in AI-powered agency business models. 4. $9 Billion Doesn’t Clear the Bar for Seed Investing in 2026 High seed valuations combined with massive dilution mean even multi-billion-dollar exits may no longer generate fund-returning outcomes. If effective entry pricing reaches $600 million after dilution, a $9 billion exit produces only a 15x return, far below the 50x outcomes that drive venture power laws. 5. If Danger Can Be Described as the Absence of Choice, They Were Now in Danger As Anthropic gains enterprise share and improves profitability, OpenAI risks losing control over its public-market timeline. Massive capital requirements and intensifying competition across every model tier could leave it with fewer strategic options, forcing it to accept whatever valuation public markets are willing to offer. 6. It’s All About Code. That’s the Only Sentence That Matters Coding is the highest-ROI, fastest-adapting, and most critical workload in AI. While consumer chat products struggle with low willingness to pay and heavy compute subsidies, developer workflows command massive enterprise budgets and offer a clearer path to durable software value creation. 7. Silicon Valley Forgets Every Three Years That the Average American Is Not Trying to Be Efficient Tech founders routinely overestimate demand for personal productivity apps by assuming everyone shares Silicon Valley’s obsession with optimization. Most consumers do not wake up wanting to grind down their inboxes or maximize output, making personal productivity a notoriously narrow and difficult category to scale.
Why Hugging Face and TBPN have more in common than you think: “If someone does buy Hugging Face, the deal’s gotta be you don’t touch it. Because if you touch it, you break it. It’s a much bigger version of the TBPN challenge. If it becomes an OpenAI commercial, TBPN has no value. If you mess with this marketplace for 10,000 models, even if you put a little ad at the top, you destroy it. If anyone actually spends $3 billion, let alone $13 billion, they’ve got to leave it alone for 24 to 36 months.” @jasonlk Single biggest advice to HF on how to stay “neutral” in this new world of being acquired @paraschopra @dabit3 @bindureddy @mattshumer_
Harry Stebbings@HarryStebbings·If you do not listen to this weekly show, you are deliberately choosing to not make yourself smarter. The world of tech has never moved faster. You need to stay up to date with the most thoughtful analysis. That is where @rodriscoll and @jasonlk come in! 😉 On the agenda this week: - NVIDIA Bonanza: Buys Poolside & Invests in Mercor and Perplexity - Anthropic's $30TRN Revenue Assumption & OpenAI Confirms IPO - Why Customer Service, Defence and Robotics are Overinflated My notes below 1. We Are So Much More Addicted to Tokens Than We Think As employees adopt 10 to 20 sub-agents running around the clock, businesses are facing unexpected $20,000 per-employee token bills. This is not a temporary trend. Token consumption is becoming an irreversible dependency, with top talent increasingly viewing continuous access to AI compute as essential to doing their jobs. 2. Why Customer Support Is Dead as a Category Standalone customer support software is collapsing as agentic interfaces merge siloed tools into unified workflows. Legacy CS and CX platforms risk becoming cheap commodities as support capabilities are absorbed into cross-functional sales, marketing, and operational agents. 3. Why AI Services Companies Are a Bullshit Category Funding traditional law or accounting firms rebranded as AI services companies relies on convoluted structures that look great on spreadsheets but break down in execution. Premium tech multiples cannot be created simply by wrapping overworked elite graduates in AI-powered agency business models. 4. $9 Billion Doesn’t Clear the Bar for Seed Investing in 2026 High seed valuations combined with massive dilution mean even multi-billion-dollar exits may no longer generate fund-returning outcomes. If effective entry pricing reaches $600 million after dilution, a $9 billion exit produces only a 15x return, far below the 50x outcomes that drive venture power laws. 5. If Danger Can Be Described as the Absence of Choice, They Were Now in Danger As Anthropic gains enterprise share and improves profitability, OpenAI risks losing control over its public-market timeline. Massive capital requirements and intensifying competition across every model tier could leave it with fewer strategic options, forcing it to accept whatever valuation public markets are willing to offer. 6. It’s All About Code. That’s the Only Sentence That Matters Coding is the highest-ROI, fastest-adapting, and most critical workload in AI. While consumer chat products struggle with low willingness to pay and heavy compute subsidies, developer workflows command massive enterprise budgets and offer a clearer path to durable software value creation. 7. Silicon Valley Forgets Every Three Years That the Average American Is Not Trying to Be Efficient Tech founders routinely overestimate demand for personal productivity apps by assuming everyone shares Silicon Valley’s obsession with optimization. Most consumers do not wake up wanting to grind down their inboxes or maximize output, making personal productivity a notoriously narrow and difficult category to scale.
“Everyone in IT has woken up and realized that these two frontier models could steal a lot of their TAM. Everyone is saying, ‘We better have a different story.’ The enterprises are saying it, Palantir is saying it. If you are an enabling technology for open-weight models, now is peak moment.” @rodriscoll Love to hear your thoughts @NaveenGRao @natolambert @simonw @AnjneyMidha @swyx
Harry Stebbings@HarryStebbings·If you do not listen to this weekly show, you are deliberately choosing to not make yourself smarter. The world of tech has never moved faster. You need to stay up to date with the most thoughtful analysis. That is where @rodriscoll and @jasonlk come in! 😉 On the agenda this week: - NVIDIA Bonanza: Buys Poolside & Invests in Mercor and Perplexity - Anthropic's $30TRN Revenue Assumption & OpenAI Confirms IPO - Why Customer Service, Defence and Robotics are Overinflated My notes below 1. We Are So Much More Addicted to Tokens Than We Think As employees adopt 10 to 20 sub-agents running around the clock, businesses are facing unexpected $20,000 per-employee token bills. This is not a temporary trend. Token consumption is becoming an irreversible dependency, with top talent increasingly viewing continuous access to AI compute as essential to doing their jobs. 2. Why Customer Support Is Dead as a Category Standalone customer support software is collapsing as agentic interfaces merge siloed tools into unified workflows. Legacy CS and CX platforms risk becoming cheap commodities as support capabilities are absorbed into cross-functional sales, marketing, and operational agents. 3. Why AI Services Companies Are a Bullshit Category Funding traditional law or accounting firms rebranded as AI services companies relies on convoluted structures that look great on spreadsheets but break down in execution. Premium tech multiples cannot be created simply by wrapping overworked elite graduates in AI-powered agency business models. 4. $9 Billion Doesn’t Clear the Bar for Seed Investing in 2026 High seed valuations combined with massive dilution mean even multi-billion-dollar exits may no longer generate fund-returning outcomes. If effective entry pricing reaches $600 million after dilution, a $9 billion exit produces only a 15x return, far below the 50x outcomes that drive venture power laws. 5. If Danger Can Be Described as the Absence of Choice, They Were Now in Danger As Anthropic gains enterprise share and improves profitability, OpenAI risks losing control over its public-market timeline. Massive capital requirements and intensifying competition across every model tier could leave it with fewer strategic options, forcing it to accept whatever valuation public markets are willing to offer. 6. It’s All About Code. That’s the Only Sentence That Matters Coding is the highest-ROI, fastest-adapting, and most critical workload in AI. While consumer chat products struggle with low willingness to pay and heavy compute subsidies, developer workflows command massive enterprise budgets and offer a clearer path to durable software value creation. 7. Silicon Valley Forgets Every Three Years That the Average American Is Not Trying to Be Efficient Tech founders routinely overestimate demand for personal productivity apps by assuming everyone shares Silicon Valley’s obsession with optimization. Most consumers do not wake up wanting to grind down their inboxes or maximize output, making personal productivity a notoriously narrow and difficult category to scale.
If you do not listen to this weekly show, you are deliberately choosing to not make yourself smarter. The world of tech has never moved faster. You need to stay up to date with the most thoughtful analysis. That is where @rodriscoll and @jasonlk come in! 😉 On the agenda this week: - NVIDIA Bonanza: Buys Poolside & Invests in Mercor and Perplexity - Anthropic's $30TRN Revenue Assumption & OpenAI Confirms IPO - Why Customer Service, Defence and Robotics are Overinflated My notes below 1. We Are So Much More Addicted to Tokens Than We Think As employees adopt 10 to 20 sub-agents running around the clock, businesses are facing unexpected $20,000 per-employee token bills. This is not a temporary trend. Token consumption is becoming an irreversible dependency, with top talent increasingly viewing continuous access to AI compute as essential to doing their jobs. 2. Why Customer Support Is Dead as a Category Standalone customer support software is collapsing as agentic interfaces merge siloed tools into unified workflows. Legacy CS and CX platforms risk becoming cheap commodities as support capabilities are absorbed into cross-functional sales, marketing, and operational agents. 3. Why AI Services Companies Are a Bullshit Category Funding traditional law or accounting firms rebranded as AI services companies relies on convoluted structures that look great on spreadsheets but break down in execution. Premium tech multiples cannot be created simply by wrapping overworked elite graduates in AI-powered agency business models. 4. $9 Billion Doesn’t Clear the Bar for Seed Investing in 2026 High seed valuations combined with massive dilution mean even multi-billion-dollar exits may no longer generate fund-returning outcomes. If effective entry pricing reaches $600 million after dilution, a $9 billion exit produces only a 15x return, far below the 50x outcomes that drive venture power laws. 5. If Danger Can Be Described as the Absence of Choice, They Were Now in Danger As Anthropic gains enterprise share and improves profitability, OpenAI risks losing control over its public-market timeline. Massive capital requirements and intensifying competition across every model tier could leave it with fewer strategic options, forcing it to accept whatever valuation public markets are willing to offer. 6. It’s All About Code. That’s the Only Sentence That Matters Coding is the highest-ROI, fastest-adapting, and most critical workload in AI. While consumer chat products struggle with low willingness to pay and heavy compute subsidies, developer workflows command massive enterprise budgets and offer a clearer path to durable software value creation. 7. Silicon Valley Forgets Every Three Years That the Average American Is Not Trying to Be Efficient Tech founders routinely overestimate demand for personal productivity apps by assuming everyone shares Silicon Valley’s obsession with optimization. Most consumers do not wake up wanting to grind down their inboxes or maximize output, making personal productivity a notoriously narrow and difficult category to scale.
@rodriscoll @jasonlk Spotify 👉 open.spotify.com/episode/1AMW9b… Youtube 👉 youtu.be/j_JlQm8DB80 Apple Podcasts 👉 podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/20v…
I repeat, Paul is the most analytical VC in Europe and this is a must read 👇
Paul@P_Bonnet·Nvidia acquires Hugging Face for ~$12.9bn. But who gets the 💰? My usual breakdown below 👇 *Investors are sharing ~$7.3bn of profits on <$400m invested. A cool ~20x blended.* *1) The single biggest winner here? Lux Capital.* 👑 Lux is taking the crown for the most $ returned in this transaction. The two rounds they led (Series A & Series C) generated ~$2.6bn combined. They also participated in the Series B. Congrats to @wolfejosh and team. The $15.0m Series A alone will return ~132.5x the capital invested, or ~$2.0bn. The most lucrative round in absolute $ returned. *2) Backing an exceptional team paid off with a >1,000x return for Betaworks and the angels* 📈 The story few people know: Hugging Face started life as a chatbot for lonely teenagers... You sent it a selfie and a sad emoji, it told you it understood. Quite far from where it landed! That is why backing an exceptional team in @ClementDelangue, @Thom_Wolf and @julien_c is always the right thing to do. It paid over 1,000x for Betaworks, Kevin Durant and Thibaud Elziere. *3) Founders and team are crushing it: not taking too much dilution along the way paid off* 👏 I estimate they will share ~$5bn in proceeds, assuming no secondary was taken along the way. A life changing outcome for them and many employees. Taking a 15% attributed option pool at exit, this would mean ~$2bn for the team and >$3bn to share for the three co-founders. Legendary! *4) Salesforce Ventures is cementing its reputation as one of the very best corporate VCs.* 🥇 Salesforce is adding Hugging Face to its long list of successful exits: Snowflake, Zoom, DocuSign, nCino, Auth0... Very few investors can claim as many successes, let alone corporates. The $235m round they led returned $675m in just three short years. Meanwhile, Salesforce's own stock has been flat for the period. Capital well invested! *5) This is a little bit of a heartbreak: but I wanted to congratulate @joinstationf here:* Hugging Face walked into StationF as a 4-person team on day one, June 2017. Back when it was a chatbot for teenagers. They went through multiple corporate programs (Microsoft, Ubisoft, then Naver). Unfortunately they were not investing or taking equity at the time - but they contributed to making it possible. And so for that: hats off. And of course, congratulations to all others involved: Addition, Sequoia, Coatue and many others. No one will be left out!
It is a travesty that sports stars are not educated more efficiently on how to manage their money in their playing careers. Clubs have a responsibility to their players to equip them for a career off the field also. cityam.com/jamie-carraghe…
Lord help us. Scale up fund targeting science and we want these managers to run it… Should be interesting!
Mark Kleinman@MarkKleinmanSky·Revealed: Some of the City's biggest asset managers, including M&G Investments and Schroders, are vying to manage a new £1bn scale-up fund targeting British science and tech champions that PM Andy Burham claims will "deliver growth in every postcode". news.sky.com/story/british-…
Why will Triple Triple, double double come back? "I don't know if it will be three years, maybe five, but this will come back. Some are new markets, and some are replacement markets. In the case of a CRM company, they might be AI-native, but they're still having to replace a core system of record for a business. In a few years from now, most of the customers out there will have a solution and will hit a replacement market. But right now it's apples and oranges." @JulienBek Have core company scaling dynamics changed or do you think triple, triple, double, double comes back to being attractive in venture @mmurph @nchirls @bhalligan @km @nbt
Harry Stebbings@HarryStebbings·Warning: this is a slightly soppy post! I first met Julien Bek 8 years ago. It was my first week at Atomico and his first week at Accel. We instantly became friends. We both have parents with chronic illnesses and I think that bonded us early on. I saw what a truly good human he is. That was very clear. Over the next 8 years, he has become one of the best investors in Europe. He is a Partner at Sequoia. He has led early rounds in bangers like Rillet and Tacto. Despite all the success, he is one of the kindest people I know. He is an incredible son, and it makes me so proud and happy to see him become a Dad. This was one of the most special shows I have done, uncovering the magic behind what makes Sequoia one of the best firms in the world. Huge thanks to @DeanMeyerrr, @gradypb, @Konstantine, @shaunmmaguire, @dougleone, @nataliemiyake, @Bryce_Keane, @LucianaLix, @_georgerobson for helping to make this such a special one. My notes below with @JulienBek. 1. What Everyone Thinks They Know About Sequoia but Actually Gets Wrong Outsiders assume Sequoia sits back and waits for the hottest deals to come to them. In reality, every partner operates as a relentless hunter. Each person is expected to perform individually while working as a team to win the most competitive deals. 2. How Sequoia Came to Be the First Ambassador in Citadel Sequoia won Citadel Securities’ first outside capital round because partner Constantine built a relationship with Ken Griffin that began when Constantine was a student. Years of persistence, mentorship, and trust ultimately beat transactional dealmaking. 3. The Biggest Takeaway From Every Sequoia Offsite Decades of legendary returns show that financial engineering and ownership tweaks do not drive top-tier performance. The common thread behind Sequoia’s greatest investments is much simpler: a sponsoring partner with extraordinary conviction. 4. Why Sequoia Is Experimenting With Different Types of Decision-Making Live IC meetings are great for fast debate, but Sequoia is incorporating asynchronous written memos to encourage slower, more deliberate thinking. Combining documented reflection with live discussion helps expose blind spots and improve investment decisions. 5. Why Sequoia Is Not Less Ownership-Centric Than Ever Targeting high ownership reflects the scarcity of a partner’s time. An investor can realistically serve on only around 20 boards over a career. Deep, hands-on company building becomes impossible when attention is diluted across hundreds of tiny 2% positions. 6. Lesson From Don Valentine on Founder Selection Don Valentine’s matrix of “founders you like” versus “founders who make money” shows that likability does not determine returns. Even arrogance can be the byproduct of an exceptional strength. Investors should focus on whether that defining spike creates a genuine competitive advantage. 7. The Biggest Lesson From Doug Leone To uncover the truth in reference checks, use Doug Leone’s technique: ask for a founder’s best reference, then immediately ask, “Who would be your worst reference, and why?” Watching how their composure shifts can reveal far more about self-awareness and operating style. (links in comments)
"Credit to Shaun for bringing in the SpaceX investment. We vote on companies, and I think someone voted a one. I've seen fours, of course. I've seen threes. Never seen a two. After that proposition occurred, he didn't give up. He just kept pushing. He forced all the partnership to fly over to see with their own eyes. We ended up doing a smaller investment that led to a big investment, and now, a couple of years later, that's one of the best investments in the history of the firm." @JulienBek What did you see that got you so excited? What is the upside from here? 10 years out, where is SpaceX @shaunmmaguire
Harry Stebbings@HarryStebbings·Warning: this is a slightly soppy post! I first met Julien Bek 8 years ago. It was my first week at Atomico and his first week at Accel. We instantly became friends. We both have parents with chronic illnesses and I think that bonded us early on. I saw what a truly good human he is. That was very clear. Over the next 8 years, he has become one of the best investors in Europe. He is a Partner at Sequoia. He has led early rounds in bangers like Rillet and Tacto. Despite all the success, he is one of the kindest people I know. He is an incredible son, and it makes me so proud and happy to see him become a Dad. This was one of the most special shows I have done, uncovering the magic behind what makes Sequoia one of the best firms in the world. Huge thanks to @DeanMeyerrr, @gradypb, @Konstantine, @shaunmmaguire, @dougleone, @nataliemiyake, @Bryce_Keane, @LucianaLix, @_georgerobson for helping to make this such a special one. My notes below with @JulienBek. 1. What Everyone Thinks They Know About Sequoia but Actually Gets Wrong Outsiders assume Sequoia sits back and waits for the hottest deals to come to them. In reality, every partner operates as a relentless hunter. Each person is expected to perform individually while working as a team to win the most competitive deals. 2. How Sequoia Came to Be the First Ambassador in Citadel Sequoia won Citadel Securities’ first outside capital round because partner Constantine built a relationship with Ken Griffin that began when Constantine was a student. Years of persistence, mentorship, and trust ultimately beat transactional dealmaking. 3. The Biggest Takeaway From Every Sequoia Offsite Decades of legendary returns show that financial engineering and ownership tweaks do not drive top-tier performance. The common thread behind Sequoia’s greatest investments is much simpler: a sponsoring partner with extraordinary conviction. 4. Why Sequoia Is Experimenting With Different Types of Decision-Making Live IC meetings are great for fast debate, but Sequoia is incorporating asynchronous written memos to encourage slower, more deliberate thinking. Combining documented reflection with live discussion helps expose blind spots and improve investment decisions. 5. Why Sequoia Is Not Less Ownership-Centric Than Ever Targeting high ownership reflects the scarcity of a partner’s time. An investor can realistically serve on only around 20 boards over a career. Deep, hands-on company building becomes impossible when attention is diluted across hundreds of tiny 2% positions. 6. Lesson From Don Valentine on Founder Selection Don Valentine’s matrix of “founders you like” versus “founders who make money” shows that likability does not determine returns. Even arrogance can be the byproduct of an exceptional strength. Investors should focus on whether that defining spike creates a genuine competitive advantage. 7. The Biggest Lesson From Doug Leone To uncover the truth in reference checks, use Doug Leone’s technique: ask for a founder’s best reference, then immediately ask, “Who would be your worst reference, and why?” Watching how their composure shifts can reveal far more about self-awareness and operating style. (links in comments)
Which partner at Sequoia is the best at selecting companies? "That one's easy. @LucianaLix, my partner, actually brought me into Sequoia. We worked together at Accel before, so I've worked with Luciana for most of my career. When I met her, she had just invested in Deliveroo. Then she did Framer (@jornvandijk), Pennylane (@Ar_Waller), and Stark (@FlorianSeibelQS). It's just banger after banger. If you look at the pattern, there's no pattern. She's been able to reinvent herself across different categories, from consumer to software to physical AI and defense." @JulienBek
Harry Stebbings@HarryStebbings·Warning: this is a slightly soppy post! I first met Julien Bek 8 years ago. It was my first week at Atomico and his first week at Accel. We instantly became friends. We both have parents with chronic illnesses and I think that bonded us early on. I saw what a truly good human he is. That was very clear. Over the next 8 years, he has become one of the best investors in Europe. He is a Partner at Sequoia. He has led early rounds in bangers like Rillet and Tacto. Despite all the success, he is one of the kindest people I know. He is an incredible son, and it makes me so proud and happy to see him become a Dad. This was one of the most special shows I have done, uncovering the magic behind what makes Sequoia one of the best firms in the world. Huge thanks to @DeanMeyerrr, @gradypb, @Konstantine, @shaunmmaguire, @dougleone, @nataliemiyake, @Bryce_Keane, @LucianaLix, @_georgerobson for helping to make this such a special one. My notes below with @JulienBek. 1. What Everyone Thinks They Know About Sequoia but Actually Gets Wrong Outsiders assume Sequoia sits back and waits for the hottest deals to come to them. In reality, every partner operates as a relentless hunter. Each person is expected to perform individually while working as a team to win the most competitive deals. 2. How Sequoia Came to Be the First Ambassador in Citadel Sequoia won Citadel Securities’ first outside capital round because partner Constantine built a relationship with Ken Griffin that began when Constantine was a student. Years of persistence, mentorship, and trust ultimately beat transactional dealmaking. 3. The Biggest Takeaway From Every Sequoia Offsite Decades of legendary returns show that financial engineering and ownership tweaks do not drive top-tier performance. The common thread behind Sequoia’s greatest investments is much simpler: a sponsoring partner with extraordinary conviction. 4. Why Sequoia Is Experimenting With Different Types of Decision-Making Live IC meetings are great for fast debate, but Sequoia is incorporating asynchronous written memos to encourage slower, more deliberate thinking. Combining documented reflection with live discussion helps expose blind spots and improve investment decisions. 5. Why Sequoia Is Not Less Ownership-Centric Than Ever Targeting high ownership reflects the scarcity of a partner’s time. An investor can realistically serve on only around 20 boards over a career. Deep, hands-on company building becomes impossible when attention is diluted across hundreds of tiny 2% positions. 6. Lesson From Don Valentine on Founder Selection Don Valentine’s matrix of “founders you like” versus “founders who make money” shows that likability does not determine returns. Even arrogance can be the byproduct of an exceptional strength. Investors should focus on whether that defining spike creates a genuine competitive advantage. 7. The Biggest Lesson From Doug Leone To uncover the truth in reference checks, use Doug Leone’s technique: ask for a founder’s best reference, then immediately ask, “Who would be your worst reference, and why?” Watching how their composure shifts can reveal far more about self-awareness and operating style. (links in comments)
Who is the best sourcer in Sequoia? "I will pick @DeanMeyerrr, my partner who sits in Tel Aviv but basically lives on a plane. He's just a phenomenal human being. He has the competitive juices of Messi, coupled with the technical depth of someone who's been working in tech his whole career, and that's a very dangerous combination. He's just amazing at reading people. He's got this ability to connect with founders, both the very young, spiky people and the guys who sold companies for billions of dollars." @JulienBek Single most impressive element about Dean @gradypb @shaunmmaguire @BogieBalkansky
Harry Stebbings@HarryStebbings·Warning: this is a slightly soppy post! I first met Julien Bek 8 years ago. It was my first week at Atomico and his first week at Accel. We instantly became friends. We both have parents with chronic illnesses and I think that bonded us early on. I saw what a truly good human he is. That was very clear. Over the next 8 years, he has become one of the best investors in Europe. He is a Partner at Sequoia. He has led early rounds in bangers like Rillet and Tacto. Despite all the success, he is one of the kindest people I know. He is an incredible son, and it makes me so proud and happy to see him become a Dad. This was one of the most special shows I have done, uncovering the magic behind what makes Sequoia one of the best firms in the world. Huge thanks to @DeanMeyerrr, @gradypb, @Konstantine, @shaunmmaguire, @dougleone, @nataliemiyake, @Bryce_Keane, @LucianaLix, @_georgerobson for helping to make this such a special one. My notes below with @JulienBek. 1. What Everyone Thinks They Know About Sequoia but Actually Gets Wrong Outsiders assume Sequoia sits back and waits for the hottest deals to come to them. In reality, every partner operates as a relentless hunter. Each person is expected to perform individually while working as a team to win the most competitive deals. 2. How Sequoia Came to Be the First Ambassador in Citadel Sequoia won Citadel Securities’ first outside capital round because partner Constantine built a relationship with Ken Griffin that began when Constantine was a student. Years of persistence, mentorship, and trust ultimately beat transactional dealmaking. 3. The Biggest Takeaway From Every Sequoia Offsite Decades of legendary returns show that financial engineering and ownership tweaks do not drive top-tier performance. The common thread behind Sequoia’s greatest investments is much simpler: a sponsoring partner with extraordinary conviction. 4. Why Sequoia Is Experimenting With Different Types of Decision-Making Live IC meetings are great for fast debate, but Sequoia is incorporating asynchronous written memos to encourage slower, more deliberate thinking. Combining documented reflection with live discussion helps expose blind spots and improve investment decisions. 5. Why Sequoia Is Not Less Ownership-Centric Than Ever Targeting high ownership reflects the scarcity of a partner’s time. An investor can realistically serve on only around 20 boards over a career. Deep, hands-on company building becomes impossible when attention is diluted across hundreds of tiny 2% positions. 6. Lesson From Don Valentine on Founder Selection Don Valentine’s matrix of “founders you like” versus “founders who make money” shows that likability does not determine returns. Even arrogance can be the byproduct of an exceptional strength. Investors should focus on whether that defining spike creates a genuine competitive advantage. 7. The Biggest Lesson From Doug Leone To uncover the truth in reference checks, use Doug Leone’s technique: ask for a founder’s best reference, then immediately ask, “Who would be your worst reference, and why?” Watching how their composure shifts can reveal far more about self-awareness and operating style. (links in comments)
Why Sequoia is not less ownership-centric than ever "The outcomes are growing. It's also more capital intensive, but most importantly, it's your time. In my career, I can expect to be on the board of 20 companies. I'm not going to short myself. I'm going to work really hard for those founders. I'm basically their co-founder. They decide how to run the business, but I sit in the passenger seat and help them close their first customers and top hires." @JulienBek What is the single most needle-moving element of partnering with Sequoia @FDavidsonT @jamiecuffe @gorkem @EugenAlpeza @wwillsun
Harry Stebbings@HarryStebbings·Warning: this is a slightly soppy post! I first met Julien Bek 8 years ago. It was my first week at Atomico and his first week at Accel. We instantly became friends. We both have parents with chronic illnesses and I think that bonded us early on. I saw what a truly good human he is. That was very clear. Over the next 8 years, he has become one of the best investors in Europe. He is a Partner at Sequoia. He has led early rounds in bangers like Rillet and Tacto. Despite all the success, he is one of the kindest people I know. He is an incredible son, and it makes me so proud and happy to see him become a Dad. This was one of the most special shows I have done, uncovering the magic behind what makes Sequoia one of the best firms in the world. Huge thanks to @DeanMeyerrr, @gradypb, @Konstantine, @shaunmmaguire, @dougleone, @nataliemiyake, @Bryce_Keane, @LucianaLix, @_georgerobson for helping to make this such a special one. My notes below with @JulienBek. 1. What Everyone Thinks They Know About Sequoia but Actually Gets Wrong Outsiders assume Sequoia sits back and waits for the hottest deals to come to them. In reality, every partner operates as a relentless hunter. Each person is expected to perform individually while working as a team to win the most competitive deals. 2. How Sequoia Came to Be the First Ambassador in Citadel Sequoia won Citadel Securities’ first outside capital round because partner Constantine built a relationship with Ken Griffin that began when Constantine was a student. Years of persistence, mentorship, and trust ultimately beat transactional dealmaking. 3. The Biggest Takeaway From Every Sequoia Offsite Decades of legendary returns show that financial engineering and ownership tweaks do not drive top-tier performance. The common thread behind Sequoia’s greatest investments is much simpler: a sponsoring partner with extraordinary conviction. 4. Why Sequoia Is Experimenting With Different Types of Decision-Making Live IC meetings are great for fast debate, but Sequoia is incorporating asynchronous written memos to encourage slower, more deliberate thinking. Combining documented reflection with live discussion helps expose blind spots and improve investment decisions. 5. Why Sequoia Is Not Less Ownership-Centric Than Ever Targeting high ownership reflects the scarcity of a partner’s time. An investor can realistically serve on only around 20 boards over a career. Deep, hands-on company building becomes impossible when attention is diluted across hundreds of tiny 2% positions. 6. Lesson From Don Valentine on Founder Selection Don Valentine’s matrix of “founders you like” versus “founders who make money” shows that likability does not determine returns. Even arrogance can be the byproduct of an exceptional strength. Investors should focus on whether that defining spike creates a genuine competitive advantage. 7. The Biggest Lesson From Doug Leone To uncover the truth in reference checks, use Doug Leone’s technique: ask for a founder’s best reference, then immediately ask, “Who would be your worst reference, and why?” Watching how their composure shifts can reveal far more about self-awareness and operating style. (links in comments)
Why investing in a neo lab now is like investing in Quora or StumbleUpon: "I think right now, if you're going to invest in the new Neo Lab, you're basically investing in Quora or StumbleUpon when Facebook and X came about." @JulienBek I would love to hear how you think about this @nikesharora @AnjneyMidha @deedydas
Harry Stebbings@HarryStebbings·Warning: this is a slightly soppy post! I first met Julien Bek 8 years ago. It was my first week at Atomico and his first week at Accel. We instantly became friends. We both have parents with chronic illnesses and I think that bonded us early on. I saw what a truly good human he is. That was very clear. Over the next 8 years, he has become one of the best investors in Europe. He is a Partner at Sequoia. He has led early rounds in bangers like Rillet and Tacto. Despite all the success, he is one of the kindest people I know. He is an incredible son, and it makes me so proud and happy to see him become a Dad. This was one of the most special shows I have done, uncovering the magic behind what makes Sequoia one of the best firms in the world. Huge thanks to @DeanMeyerrr, @gradypb, @Konstantine, @shaunmmaguire, @dougleone, @nataliemiyake, @Bryce_Keane, @LucianaLix, @_georgerobson for helping to make this such a special one. My notes below with @JulienBek. 1. What Everyone Thinks They Know About Sequoia but Actually Gets Wrong Outsiders assume Sequoia sits back and waits for the hottest deals to come to them. In reality, every partner operates as a relentless hunter. Each person is expected to perform individually while working as a team to win the most competitive deals. 2. How Sequoia Came to Be the First Ambassador in Citadel Sequoia won Citadel Securities’ first outside capital round because partner Constantine built a relationship with Ken Griffin that began when Constantine was a student. Years of persistence, mentorship, and trust ultimately beat transactional dealmaking. 3. The Biggest Takeaway From Every Sequoia Offsite Decades of legendary returns show that financial engineering and ownership tweaks do not drive top-tier performance. The common thread behind Sequoia’s greatest investments is much simpler: a sponsoring partner with extraordinary conviction. 4. Why Sequoia Is Experimenting With Different Types of Decision-Making Live IC meetings are great for fast debate, but Sequoia is incorporating asynchronous written memos to encourage slower, more deliberate thinking. Combining documented reflection with live discussion helps expose blind spots and improve investment decisions. 5. Why Sequoia Is Not Less Ownership-Centric Than Ever Targeting high ownership reflects the scarcity of a partner’s time. An investor can realistically serve on only around 20 boards over a career. Deep, hands-on company building becomes impossible when attention is diluted across hundreds of tiny 2% positions. 6. Lesson From Don Valentine on Founder Selection Don Valentine’s matrix of “founders you like” versus “founders who make money” shows that likability does not determine returns. Even arrogance can be the byproduct of an exceptional strength. Investors should focus on whether that defining spike creates a genuine competitive advantage. 7. The Biggest Lesson From Doug Leone To uncover the truth in reference checks, use Doug Leone’s technique: ask for a founder’s best reference, then immediately ask, “Who would be your worst reference, and why?” Watching how their composure shifts can reveal far more about self-awareness and operating style. (links in comments)
Why Sequoia Invested $250M into Anthropic: "It's very important that you update your priors if the environment has changed. The human brain is just not very good at dealing with exponentials. We can think very well linearly, but not exponentially. In this case, I think we underestimated the company in the early days." @JulienBek I have to ask, what specifically did you not see that you wish you had seen @gradypb @Alfred_Lin @shaunmmaguire
Harry Stebbings@HarryStebbings·Warning: this is a slightly soppy post! I first met Julien Bek 8 years ago. It was my first week at Atomico and his first week at Accel. We instantly became friends. We both have parents with chronic illnesses and I think that bonded us early on. I saw what a truly good human he is. That was very clear. Over the next 8 years, he has become one of the best investors in Europe. He is a Partner at Sequoia. He has led early rounds in bangers like Rillet and Tacto. Despite all the success, he is one of the kindest people I know. He is an incredible son, and it makes me so proud and happy to see him become a Dad. This was one of the most special shows I have done, uncovering the magic behind what makes Sequoia one of the best firms in the world. Huge thanks to @DeanMeyerrr, @gradypb, @Konstantine, @shaunmmaguire, @dougleone, @nataliemiyake, @Bryce_Keane, @LucianaLix, @_georgerobson for helping to make this such a special one. My notes below with @JulienBek. 1. What Everyone Thinks They Know About Sequoia but Actually Gets Wrong Outsiders assume Sequoia sits back and waits for the hottest deals to come to them. In reality, every partner operates as a relentless hunter. Each person is expected to perform individually while working as a team to win the most competitive deals. 2. How Sequoia Came to Be the First Ambassador in Citadel Sequoia won Citadel Securities’ first outside capital round because partner Constantine built a relationship with Ken Griffin that began when Constantine was a student. Years of persistence, mentorship, and trust ultimately beat transactional dealmaking. 3. The Biggest Takeaway From Every Sequoia Offsite Decades of legendary returns show that financial engineering and ownership tweaks do not drive top-tier performance. The common thread behind Sequoia’s greatest investments is much simpler: a sponsoring partner with extraordinary conviction. 4. Why Sequoia Is Experimenting With Different Types of Decision-Making Live IC meetings are great for fast debate, but Sequoia is incorporating asynchronous written memos to encourage slower, more deliberate thinking. Combining documented reflection with live discussion helps expose blind spots and improve investment decisions. 5. Why Sequoia Is Not Less Ownership-Centric Than Ever Targeting high ownership reflects the scarcity of a partner’s time. An investor can realistically serve on only around 20 boards over a career. Deep, hands-on company building becomes impossible when attention is diluted across hundreds of tiny 2% positions. 6. Lesson From Don Valentine on Founder Selection Don Valentine’s matrix of “founders you like” versus “founders who make money” shows that likability does not determine returns. Even arrogance can be the byproduct of an exceptional strength. Investors should focus on whether that defining spike creates a genuine competitive advantage. 7. The Biggest Lesson From Doug Leone To uncover the truth in reference checks, use Doug Leone’s technique: ask for a founder’s best reference, then immediately ask, “Who would be your worst reference, and why?” Watching how their composure shifts can reveal far more about self-awareness and operating style. (links in comments)
How Sequoia came to be the first ambassador in Citadel "@Konstantine helped us lead the investment in Citadel Securities, Ken Griffin's company. They had never taken outside capital. The reason we were able to invest is Konstantine built a relationship with Ken since he was a student. He had been his mentor for years and years. Konstantine never gave up and just kept asking, 'Can we invest?' Until Ken kindly said yes." @JulienBek
Harry Stebbings@HarryStebbings·Warning: this is a slightly soppy post! I first met Julien Bek 8 years ago. It was my first week at Atomico and his first week at Accel. We instantly became friends. We both have parents with chronic illnesses and I think that bonded us early on. I saw what a truly good human he is. That was very clear. Over the next 8 years, he has become one of the best investors in Europe. He is a Partner at Sequoia. He has led early rounds in bangers like Rillet and Tacto. Despite all the success, he is one of the kindest people I know. He is an incredible son, and it makes me so proud and happy to see him become a Dad. This was one of the most special shows I have done, uncovering the magic behind what makes Sequoia one of the best firms in the world. Huge thanks to @DeanMeyerrr, @gradypb, @Konstantine, @shaunmmaguire, @dougleone, @nataliemiyake, @Bryce_Keane, @LucianaLix, @_georgerobson for helping to make this such a special one. My notes below with @JulienBek. 1. What Everyone Thinks They Know About Sequoia but Actually Gets Wrong Outsiders assume Sequoia sits back and waits for the hottest deals to come to them. In reality, every partner operates as a relentless hunter. Each person is expected to perform individually while working as a team to win the most competitive deals. 2. How Sequoia Came to Be the First Ambassador in Citadel Sequoia won Citadel Securities’ first outside capital round because partner Constantine built a relationship with Ken Griffin that began when Constantine was a student. Years of persistence, mentorship, and trust ultimately beat transactional dealmaking. 3. The Biggest Takeaway From Every Sequoia Offsite Decades of legendary returns show that financial engineering and ownership tweaks do not drive top-tier performance. The common thread behind Sequoia’s greatest investments is much simpler: a sponsoring partner with extraordinary conviction. 4. Why Sequoia Is Experimenting With Different Types of Decision-Making Live IC meetings are great for fast debate, but Sequoia is incorporating asynchronous written memos to encourage slower, more deliberate thinking. Combining documented reflection with live discussion helps expose blind spots and improve investment decisions. 5. Why Sequoia Is Not Less Ownership-Centric Than Ever Targeting high ownership reflects the scarcity of a partner’s time. An investor can realistically serve on only around 20 boards over a career. Deep, hands-on company building becomes impossible when attention is diluted across hundreds of tiny 2% positions. 6. Lesson From Don Valentine on Founder Selection Don Valentine’s matrix of “founders you like” versus “founders who make money” shows that likability does not determine returns. Even arrogance can be the byproduct of an exceptional strength. Investors should focus on whether that defining spike creates a genuine competitive advantage. 7. The Biggest Lesson From Doug Leone To uncover the truth in reference checks, use Doug Leone’s technique: ask for a founder’s best reference, then immediately ask, “Who would be your worst reference, and why?” Watching how their composure shifts can reveal far more about self-awareness and operating style. (links in comments)
What everyone thinks they know about Sequoia but actually gets wrong "Everyone thinks that we're just waiting for the phone to ring for the next Anthropic to call us to invest. That's completely false. Everyone at Sequoia is a hunter. It doesn't matter how long you've been here, everyone expects you to perform. It's very competitive out there. We think that people need to behave exceptionally well as individuals, but win as a team." @JulienBek What does everyone think they know about Sequoia that they actually get wrong @sonyatweetybird @Alfred_Lin @gradypb
Harry Stebbings@HarryStebbings·Warning: this is a slightly soppy post! I first met Julien Bek 8 years ago. It was my first week at Atomico and his first week at Accel. We instantly became friends. We both have parents with chronic illnesses and I think that bonded us early on. I saw what a truly good human he is. That was very clear. Over the next 8 years, he has become one of the best investors in Europe. He is a Partner at Sequoia. He has led early rounds in bangers like Rillet and Tacto. Despite all the success, he is one of the kindest people I know. He is an incredible son, and it makes me so proud and happy to see him become a Dad. This was one of the most special shows I have done, uncovering the magic behind what makes Sequoia one of the best firms in the world. Huge thanks to @DeanMeyerrr, @gradypb, @Konstantine, @shaunmmaguire, @dougleone, @nataliemiyake, @Bryce_Keane, @LucianaLix, @_georgerobson for helping to make this such a special one. My notes below with @JulienBek. 1. What Everyone Thinks They Know About Sequoia but Actually Gets Wrong Outsiders assume Sequoia sits back and waits for the hottest deals to come to them. In reality, every partner operates as a relentless hunter. Each person is expected to perform individually while working as a team to win the most competitive deals. 2. How Sequoia Came to Be the First Ambassador in Citadel Sequoia won Citadel Securities’ first outside capital round because partner Constantine built a relationship with Ken Griffin that began when Constantine was a student. Years of persistence, mentorship, and trust ultimately beat transactional dealmaking. 3. The Biggest Takeaway From Every Sequoia Offsite Decades of legendary returns show that financial engineering and ownership tweaks do not drive top-tier performance. The common thread behind Sequoia’s greatest investments is much simpler: a sponsoring partner with extraordinary conviction. 4. Why Sequoia Is Experimenting With Different Types of Decision-Making Live IC meetings are great for fast debate, but Sequoia is incorporating asynchronous written memos to encourage slower, more deliberate thinking. Combining documented reflection with live discussion helps expose blind spots and improve investment decisions. 5. Why Sequoia Is Not Less Ownership-Centric Than Ever Targeting high ownership reflects the scarcity of a partner’s time. An investor can realistically serve on only around 20 boards over a career. Deep, hands-on company building becomes impossible when attention is diluted across hundreds of tiny 2% positions. 6. Lesson From Don Valentine on Founder Selection Don Valentine’s matrix of “founders you like” versus “founders who make money” shows that likability does not determine returns. Even arrogance can be the byproduct of an exceptional strength. Investors should focus on whether that defining spike creates a genuine competitive advantage. 7. The Biggest Lesson From Doug Leone To uncover the truth in reference checks, use Doug Leone’s technique: ask for a founder’s best reference, then immediately ask, “Who would be your worst reference, and why?” Watching how their composure shifts can reveal far more about self-awareness and operating style. (links in comments)
My first day at Sequoia and a lesson from Doug Leone "I show up to the office at maybe 4:30 AM. I felt very happy about myself hustling to the office that day. As I'm about to push the door, I see a man on the other side, and he looks at me and goes, 'What are you doing here so early?' I tell him, 'I'm here to take my first call. What are you doing here so early?' And he says, 'I've already taken my first call.'" @JulienBek One thing, single biggest lesson from Doug, what would it be @shaunmmaguire @giliraanan @DavidCahn6
Harry Stebbings@HarryStebbings·Warning: this is a slightly soppy post! I first met Julien Bek 8 years ago. It was my first week at Atomico and his first week at Accel. We instantly became friends. We both have parents with chronic illnesses and I think that bonded us early on. I saw what a truly good human he is. That was very clear. Over the next 8 years, he has become one of the best investors in Europe. He is a Partner at Sequoia. He has led early rounds in bangers like Rillet and Tacto. Despite all the success, he is one of the kindest people I know. He is an incredible son, and it makes me so proud and happy to see him become a Dad. This was one of the most special shows I have done, uncovering the magic behind what makes Sequoia one of the best firms in the world. Huge thanks to @DeanMeyerrr, @gradypb, @Konstantine, @shaunmmaguire, @dougleone, @nataliemiyake, @Bryce_Keane, @LucianaLix, @_georgerobson for helping to make this such a special one. My notes below with @JulienBek. 1. What Everyone Thinks They Know About Sequoia but Actually Gets Wrong Outsiders assume Sequoia sits back and waits for the hottest deals to come to them. In reality, every partner operates as a relentless hunter. Each person is expected to perform individually while working as a team to win the most competitive deals. 2. How Sequoia Came to Be the First Ambassador in Citadel Sequoia won Citadel Securities’ first outside capital round because partner Constantine built a relationship with Ken Griffin that began when Constantine was a student. Years of persistence, mentorship, and trust ultimately beat transactional dealmaking. 3. The Biggest Takeaway From Every Sequoia Offsite Decades of legendary returns show that financial engineering and ownership tweaks do not drive top-tier performance. The common thread behind Sequoia’s greatest investments is much simpler: a sponsoring partner with extraordinary conviction. 4. Why Sequoia Is Experimenting With Different Types of Decision-Making Live IC meetings are great for fast debate, but Sequoia is incorporating asynchronous written memos to encourage slower, more deliberate thinking. Combining documented reflection with live discussion helps expose blind spots and improve investment decisions. 5. Why Sequoia Is Not Less Ownership-Centric Than Ever Targeting high ownership reflects the scarcity of a partner’s time. An investor can realistically serve on only around 20 boards over a career. Deep, hands-on company building becomes impossible when attention is diluted across hundreds of tiny 2% positions. 6. Lesson From Don Valentine on Founder Selection Don Valentine’s matrix of “founders you like” versus “founders who make money” shows that likability does not determine returns. Even arrogance can be the byproduct of an exceptional strength. Investors should focus on whether that defining spike creates a genuine competitive advantage. 7. The Biggest Lesson From Doug Leone To uncover the truth in reference checks, use Doug Leone’s technique: ask for a founder’s best reference, then immediately ask, “Who would be your worst reference, and why?” Watching how their composure shifts can reveal far more about self-awareness and operating style. (links in comments)
Paul is the smartest person in European venture. This is a must read!
Paul@P_Bonnet·In 1852 aluminium cost twice as much as gold. Then the price fell over 99.9%. Yet it built one of the largest materials markets on earth. What it says about AI tokens: x.com/i/article/2084…
Warning: this is a slightly soppy post! I first met Julien Bek 8 years ago. It was my first week at Atomico and his first week at Accel. We instantly became friends. We both have parents with chronic illnesses and I think that bonded us early on. I saw what a truly good human he is. That was very clear. Over the next 8 years, he has become one of the best investors in Europe. He is a Partner at Sequoia. He has led early rounds in bangers like Rillet and Tacto. Despite all the success, he is one of the kindest people I know. He is an incredible son, and it makes me so proud and happy to see him become a Dad. This was one of the most special shows I have done, uncovering the magic behind what makes Sequoia one of the best firms in the world. Huge thanks to @DeanMeyerrr, @gradypb, @Konstantine, @shaunmmaguire, @dougleone, @nataliemiyake, @Bryce_Keane, @LucianaLix, @_georgerobson for helping to make this such a special one. My notes below with @JulienBek. 1. What Everyone Thinks They Know About Sequoia but Actually Gets Wrong Outsiders assume Sequoia sits back and waits for the hottest deals to come to them. In reality, every partner operates as a relentless hunter. Each person is expected to perform individually while working as a team to win the most competitive deals. 2. How Sequoia Came to Be the First Ambassador in Citadel Sequoia won Citadel Securities’ first outside capital round because partner Constantine built a relationship with Ken Griffin that began when Constantine was a student. Years of persistence, mentorship, and trust ultimately beat transactional dealmaking. 3. The Biggest Takeaway From Every Sequoia Offsite Decades of legendary returns show that financial engineering and ownership tweaks do not drive top-tier performance. The common thread behind Sequoia’s greatest investments is much simpler: a sponsoring partner with extraordinary conviction. 4. Why Sequoia Is Experimenting With Different Types of Decision-Making Live IC meetings are great for fast debate, but Sequoia is incorporating asynchronous written memos to encourage slower, more deliberate thinking. Combining documented reflection with live discussion helps expose blind spots and improve investment decisions. 5. Why Sequoia Is Not Less Ownership-Centric Than Ever Targeting high ownership reflects the scarcity of a partner’s time. An investor can realistically serve on only around 20 boards over a career. Deep, hands-on company building becomes impossible when attention is diluted across hundreds of tiny 2% positions. 6. Lesson From Don Valentine on Founder Selection Don Valentine’s matrix of “founders you like” versus “founders who make money” shows that likability does not determine returns. Even arrogance can be the byproduct of an exceptional strength. Investors should focus on whether that defining spike creates a genuine competitive advantage. 7. The Biggest Lesson From Doug Leone To uncover the truth in reference checks, use Doug Leone’s technique: ask for a founder’s best reference, then immediately ask, “Who would be your worst reference, and why?” Watching how their composure shifts can reveal far more about self-awareness and operating style. (links in comments)
Spotify 👉 open.spotify.com/episode/6xEx43… Youtube 👉 youtu.be/N8CBejLRztg Apple Podcasts 👉 podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/20v…
I have interviewed 1,000 founders and had the fortune to invest in many of them. The top 5 founders that I have ever met (not in order): - @alanchanguk (Fuse Energy) - @awxjack (Airwallex) - @ceo_clickhouse (ClickHouse, hanging out today in pic!) - @lqiao (Fireworks) - @MaxJunestrand (Legora)
"OpenRouter is really strong in developer-type tools where you want a simple way to pick a model. It's really strong with chatbots where they don't have to be perfect. For frontier-esque models, people don't rotate through 11 models, and I don't think OpenRouter is the right product for that. The risk to Stripe is that they end up owning a successful niche product, and that's not their DNA." @jasonlk Love to hear your thoughts on this and the potential “niche” market @shensi @eglyman @awxjack @ThibaultJaigu @zachmoskow
Harry Stebbings@HarryStebbings·If you are not staying up to date with the most pressing news, you are doing a disservice to yourself and your company. This is the only show you have to listen to every week and what a week’s worth of news it was… AGENDA: - SpaceX Buys Cursor for $60BN - Stripe's $8BN OpenRouter Bet - Anthropic's First Profit & The Math Behind Reaching $600BN in Revenue? - Lovable and Higgsfield Raise Mega Rounds My notes below with @jasonlk and @rodriscoll: 1. I Would Rather Be Acquired by @elonmusk Than Zuck Founders often prefer selling to an iconic, highly effective operator like Elon Musk over entering Meta’s corporate structure. Despite advice to ignore brand prestige, emotional alignment and shared vision frequently play a major role in determining the ultimate M&A destination. 2. What Buyout Financiers Should Look for in Companies Today Private equity buyers should target closed systems of record with near-zero churn and highly predictable cash flows. Closed architectures protect ecosystem budgets and create a defensible moat against disruption from third-party AI agents. 3. Why OpenRouter Is a Niche Product That Could Lead to a Bad Acquisition for Stripe Multi-model routers thrive in developer environments, but high-reasoning B2B workflows often standardize on specific models to prevent drift. Stripe risks acquiring a niche tool serving narrow developer use cases rather than a platform with broad enterprise transaction potential. 4. Why Revenue Is So Weird in M&A: The Tale of Two Worlds PE buyouts require precise accounting around existing revenue, while strategic acquirers can largely ignore it. Strategic M&A prices platforms on future expansion potential, sometimes abandoning legacy revenue streams entirely to unlock a much larger market opportunity. 5. Why the OpenRouter Deal Does Make Sense Paying a premium for an elegant, deployable product can be far more efficient than building the infrastructure internally. Even if OpenRouter remains a niche tool, an acquisition could provide immediate access to massive AI inference flows and create a critical second growth engine. 6. Why Optimism Beats Pessimism in Hyper-Growth Markets Fixating on early unit economics can make investors sound smart while causing them to miss massive market waves. In booming categories like AI coding, products scaling rapidly despite margin headwinds can still become category leaders and attract strategic buyers capable of absorbing those costs. 7. Why Legacy Software Roadmaps Can’t Survive the Agentic Era Rapidly improving AI capabilities have broken the traditional quarterly software roadmap. Engineering teams embracing agentic workflows can pull years of planned development forward, leaving slower legacy teams built around incremental release cycles increasingly behind. (links in comments)
Why the OpenRouter deal does make sense "Stripe actually appears to be very good at acquisitions. It's how it accelerated into crypto and otherwise. They're good at it. If you're good at M&A, and this is 5% of your market cap plus cash, and you want it tomorrow, it makes sense. I love OpenRouter. I'm a customer, I'm a user. It was one of these pieces of software which is just instantly easier to deploy. It's just elegant." @jasonlk What is your bull case on where OpenRouter will be in 5 years, given the acquisition @deedydas @AnjneyMidha @davefontenot
Harry Stebbings@HarryStebbings·If you are not staying up to date with the most pressing news, you are doing a disservice to yourself and your company. This is the only show you have to listen to every week and what a week’s worth of news it was… AGENDA: - SpaceX Buys Cursor for $60BN - Stripe's $8BN OpenRouter Bet - Anthropic's First Profit & The Math Behind Reaching $600BN in Revenue? - Lovable and Higgsfield Raise Mega Rounds My notes below with @jasonlk and @rodriscoll: 1. I Would Rather Be Acquired by @elonmusk Than Zuck Founders often prefer selling to an iconic, highly effective operator like Elon Musk over entering Meta’s corporate structure. Despite advice to ignore brand prestige, emotional alignment and shared vision frequently play a major role in determining the ultimate M&A destination. 2. What Buyout Financiers Should Look for in Companies Today Private equity buyers should target closed systems of record with near-zero churn and highly predictable cash flows. Closed architectures protect ecosystem budgets and create a defensible moat against disruption from third-party AI agents. 3. Why OpenRouter Is a Niche Product That Could Lead to a Bad Acquisition for Stripe Multi-model routers thrive in developer environments, but high-reasoning B2B workflows often standardize on specific models to prevent drift. Stripe risks acquiring a niche tool serving narrow developer use cases rather than a platform with broad enterprise transaction potential. 4. Why Revenue Is So Weird in M&A: The Tale of Two Worlds PE buyouts require precise accounting around existing revenue, while strategic acquirers can largely ignore it. Strategic M&A prices platforms on future expansion potential, sometimes abandoning legacy revenue streams entirely to unlock a much larger market opportunity. 5. Why the OpenRouter Deal Does Make Sense Paying a premium for an elegant, deployable product can be far more efficient than building the infrastructure internally. Even if OpenRouter remains a niche tool, an acquisition could provide immediate access to massive AI inference flows and create a critical second growth engine. 6. Why Optimism Beats Pessimism in Hyper-Growth Markets Fixating on early unit economics can make investors sound smart while causing them to miss massive market waves. In booming categories like AI coding, products scaling rapidly despite margin headwinds can still become category leaders and attract strategic buyers capable of absorbing those costs. 7. Why Legacy Software Roadmaps Can’t Survive the Agentic Era Rapidly improving AI capabilities have broken the traditional quarterly software roadmap. Engineering teams embracing agentic workflows can pull years of planned development forward, leaving slower legacy teams built around incremental release cycles increasingly behind. (links in comments)
"I would much rather initially work for Elon than for Zuck. I tell founders to ignore the brand. Ignore what you think the job is today, because you have no idea in 24 months what the hell you're going to be doing. It is incredibly emotionally important to founders to land in something they want to land in. I would not want to land at Meta today." @jasonlk @carlrivera @glencoates @RamaswmySridhar @shishirmehrotra @michaelginzo what advice would you give to founders selling their company and choosing the acquirer?
Harry Stebbings@HarryStebbings·If you are not staying up to date with the most pressing news, you are doing a disservice to yourself and your company. This is the only show you have to listen to every week and what a week’s worth of news it was… AGENDA: - SpaceX Buys Cursor for $60BN - Stripe's $8BN OpenRouter Bet - Anthropic's First Profit & The Math Behind Reaching $600BN in Revenue? - Lovable and Higgsfield Raise Mega Rounds My notes below with @jasonlk and @rodriscoll: 1. I Would Rather Be Acquired by @elonmusk Than Zuck Founders often prefer selling to an iconic, highly effective operator like Elon Musk over entering Meta’s corporate structure. Despite advice to ignore brand prestige, emotional alignment and shared vision frequently play a major role in determining the ultimate M&A destination. 2. What Buyout Financiers Should Look for in Companies Today Private equity buyers should target closed systems of record with near-zero churn and highly predictable cash flows. Closed architectures protect ecosystem budgets and create a defensible moat against disruption from third-party AI agents. 3. Why OpenRouter Is a Niche Product That Could Lead to a Bad Acquisition for Stripe Multi-model routers thrive in developer environments, but high-reasoning B2B workflows often standardize on specific models to prevent drift. Stripe risks acquiring a niche tool serving narrow developer use cases rather than a platform with broad enterprise transaction potential. 4. Why Revenue Is So Weird in M&A: The Tale of Two Worlds PE buyouts require precise accounting around existing revenue, while strategic acquirers can largely ignore it. Strategic M&A prices platforms on future expansion potential, sometimes abandoning legacy revenue streams entirely to unlock a much larger market opportunity. 5. Why the OpenRouter Deal Does Make Sense Paying a premium for an elegant, deployable product can be far more efficient than building the infrastructure internally. Even if OpenRouter remains a niche tool, an acquisition could provide immediate access to massive AI inference flows and create a critical second growth engine. 6. Why Optimism Beats Pessimism in Hyper-Growth Markets Fixating on early unit economics can make investors sound smart while causing them to miss massive market waves. In booming categories like AI coding, products scaling rapidly despite margin headwinds can still become category leaders and attract strategic buyers capable of absorbing those costs. 7. Why Legacy Software Roadmaps Can’t Survive the Agentic Era Rapidly improving AI capabilities have broken the traditional quarterly software roadmap. Engineering teams embracing agentic workflows can pull years of planned development forward, leaving slower legacy teams built around incremental release cycles increasingly behind. (links in comments)
We wrote a $10M check into Fireworks in 10 mins. Two reasons: 1. Lin and Dmytro are literally best in the world for what they do. Top 0.000001%. 2. Companies of the future will have specialised intelligence built on their own models, with their own data. Fireworks will help them do so. Because of both of these, I wrote $500BN as company size in 5 years. @P_Bonnet said $300BN. I think we will both undershoot it massively...
Lin Qiao@lqiao·We are excited to drive the research work of Tenet with Harvey, delivering frontier quality across 24 areas of corporate law. Tenet exceeded Opus5 and Fable at many dimensions, covering 1300+ legal tasks. There are many good findings from this work. Congrats @harvey team for launching Tenet!
If you are not staying up to date with the most pressing news, you are doing a disservice to yourself and your company. This is the only show you have to listen to every week and what a week’s worth of news it was… AGENDA: - SpaceX Buys Cursor for $60BN - Stripe's $8BN OpenRouter Bet - Anthropic's First Profit & The Math Behind Reaching $600BN in Revenue? - Lovable and Higgsfield Raise Mega Rounds My notes below with @jasonlk and @rodriscoll: 1. I Would Rather Be Acquired by @elonmusk Than Zuck Founders often prefer selling to an iconic, highly effective operator like Elon Musk over entering Meta’s corporate structure. Despite advice to ignore brand prestige, emotional alignment and shared vision frequently play a major role in determining the ultimate M&A destination. 2. What Buyout Financiers Should Look for in Companies Today Private equity buyers should target closed systems of record with near-zero churn and highly predictable cash flows. Closed architectures protect ecosystem budgets and create a defensible moat against disruption from third-party AI agents. 3. Why OpenRouter Is a Niche Product That Could Lead to a Bad Acquisition for Stripe Multi-model routers thrive in developer environments, but high-reasoning B2B workflows often standardize on specific models to prevent drift. Stripe risks acquiring a niche tool serving narrow developer use cases rather than a platform with broad enterprise transaction potential. 4. Why Revenue Is So Weird in M&A: The Tale of Two Worlds PE buyouts require precise accounting around existing revenue, while strategic acquirers can largely ignore it. Strategic M&A prices platforms on future expansion potential, sometimes abandoning legacy revenue streams entirely to unlock a much larger market opportunity. 5. Why the OpenRouter Deal Does Make Sense Paying a premium for an elegant, deployable product can be far more efficient than building the infrastructure internally. Even if OpenRouter remains a niche tool, an acquisition could provide immediate access to massive AI inference flows and create a critical second growth engine. 6. Why Optimism Beats Pessimism in Hyper-Growth Markets Fixating on early unit economics can make investors sound smart while causing them to miss massive market waves. In booming categories like AI coding, products scaling rapidly despite margin headwinds can still become category leaders and attract strategic buyers capable of absorbing those costs. 7. Why Legacy Software Roadmaps Can’t Survive the Agentic Era Rapidly improving AI capabilities have broken the traditional quarterly software roadmap. Engineering teams embracing agentic workflows can pull years of planned development forward, leaving slower legacy teams built around incremental release cycles increasingly behind. (links in comments)
Spotify 👉 open.spotify.com/episode/3yxdVI… Youtube 👉 youtu.be/y_3EjW0dyeI Apple Podcasts 👉 podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/20v…
"Travis used to have a saying: 'We need to raise more money than all our competitors in the world combined.' The basis for competition for rideshare was clear, so it was just a land grab at that point. Money helped you solve the land grab." @andrewgordonmac Do you believe we are in a similar market now, where capital truly is the moat for many businesses @travisk @altcap @Alfred_Lin @nikesharora
Harry Stebbings@HarryStebbings·I have interviewed 1,000 of the best operators of the last 10 years. Ironically, one of the best I have ever interviewed isn’t actually a Founder. He is the longest serving employee at @Uber. Andrew MacDonald. He rarely does interviews and this was the most insane behind the scenes at one of the worlds largest companies: - Spending $52M per week in China - Lessons from Travis Kalanick - Why autonomy is existential - How AI helps and hurts Uber There was so much in this, I took notes and have added them below: 1. How Does Uber Decide What New Products to Do Versus Not Do? At nearly $250 billion in gross bookings, new mobility or delivery products must show a credible path to billions in transaction volume within a few years to justify organizational resources. Anything smaller risks being swallowed by the demands of the core business. 2. How Companies Need to Extract AI Efficiency Measuring AI ROI on a per-employee basis is nearly impossible because saved hours simply get absorbed by other work. Instead, leaders should capture efficiency through OpEx by capping or reducing headcount targets and requiring teams to produce more with existing resources. 3. Uber Have a SWAT Team of the Best AI Engineers Uber created a dedicated pod of 30 elite AI engineers paired directly with G&A teams and business process owners. By rebuilding workflows from the ground up, they cut weekly pricing processes from 15 hours to two and marketing QA from two weeks to two days. 4. Why We Were Right to Focus on Core Strategy and Divest the Autonomy Business at the Time When COVID erased 84% of Uber’s mobility revenue in three weeks, the company divested its ATG autonomous driving unit. Exiting a capital-intensive race where Uber trailed competitors freed the company to focus on turning its core marketplace into a cash-flowing machine. 5. Will Uber Have More or Fewer Employees in Five Years’ Time? While AI will create entirely new industries, execution-heavy enterprise functions will see significant headcount contraction. Roles centered on customer support, sales ops, content production, and reporting analytics will face substantial augmentation and partial replacement by AI agents. 6. Crazy Story Number One From Working in China At the peak of its market-share war with DiDi in China, Uber burned $52 million per week on price subsidies alone. Competing without access to WeChat made winning nearly impossible, but aggressive capital deployment gave Uber the leverage needed to negotiate a successful local exit. 7. Single Biggest Lesson From Travis Kalanick Travis Kalanick’s operational superpower was walking into a meeting, asking pointed questions, and advancing weeks of expert thinking in 15 minutes. Great leaders create leverage by constantly exercising this problem-solving muscle and teaching the principles behind their decisions. (links in comments) @andrewgordonmac
Was Uber Right to Stop Investing in Autonomous "During Covid, our mobility business had lost 84% of our top line in three weeks. The company was burning billions annually, and we didn't have a core business producing cash. We did not believe we were leading in autonomy at the time. We were trailing, and Uber had a lot to prove that we could lead, win, and make money in our core business. We divested ATG. We turned the core businesses into cash-flowing machines, took the company public, and grew the business. Almost any metric you pick from that point in time is up and to the right." @andrewgordonmac Given the challenging time at the time, was Uber right to divest of ATG, in your mind @typesfast @marceloclaure @jason @DavidSacks @epaley
Harry Stebbings@HarryStebbings·I have interviewed 1,000 of the best operators of the last 10 years. Ironically, one of the best I have ever interviewed isn’t actually a Founder. He is the longest serving employee at @Uber. Andrew MacDonald. He rarely does interviews and this was the most insane behind the scenes at one of the worlds largest companies: - Spending $52M per week in China - Lessons from Travis Kalanick - Why autonomy is existential - How AI helps and hurts Uber There was so much in this, I took notes and have added them below: 1. How Does Uber Decide What New Products to Do Versus Not Do? At nearly $250 billion in gross bookings, new mobility or delivery products must show a credible path to billions in transaction volume within a few years to justify organizational resources. Anything smaller risks being swallowed by the demands of the core business. 2. How Companies Need to Extract AI Efficiency Measuring AI ROI on a per-employee basis is nearly impossible because saved hours simply get absorbed by other work. Instead, leaders should capture efficiency through OpEx by capping or reducing headcount targets and requiring teams to produce more with existing resources. 3. Uber Have a SWAT Team of the Best AI Engineers Uber created a dedicated pod of 30 elite AI engineers paired directly with G&A teams and business process owners. By rebuilding workflows from the ground up, they cut weekly pricing processes from 15 hours to two and marketing QA from two weeks to two days. 4. Why We Were Right to Focus on Core Strategy and Divest the Autonomy Business at the Time When COVID erased 84% of Uber’s mobility revenue in three weeks, the company divested its ATG autonomous driving unit. Exiting a capital-intensive race where Uber trailed competitors freed the company to focus on turning its core marketplace into a cash-flowing machine. 5. Will Uber Have More or Fewer Employees in Five Years’ Time? While AI will create entirely new industries, execution-heavy enterprise functions will see significant headcount contraction. Roles centered on customer support, sales ops, content production, and reporting analytics will face substantial augmentation and partial replacement by AI agents. 6. Crazy Story Number One From Working in China At the peak of its market-share war with DiDi in China, Uber burned $52 million per week on price subsidies alone. Competing without access to WeChat made winning nearly impossible, but aggressive capital deployment gave Uber the leverage needed to negotiate a successful local exit. 7. Single Biggest Lesson From Travis Kalanick Travis Kalanick’s operational superpower was walking into a meeting, asking pointed questions, and advancing weeks of expert thinking in 15 minutes. Great leaders create leverage by constantly exercising this problem-solving muscle and teaching the principles behind their decisions. (links in comments) @andrewgordonmac
What does Uber need to do to get to 500 million users? "Taking an UberX to and from work every day in New York City for $35 a direction, that's still a luxury product. If we want to get to 500M users, and go from using us six times a month to 25 times a month, the average cost of that transaction has to come down." @andrewgordonmac I would love to hear your thoughts @jason @cyantist @BillAckman @shervin other than price, what is the single biggest barrier to Uber hitting 500M users?
Harry Stebbings@HarryStebbings·I have interviewed 1,000 of the best operators of the last 10 years. Ironically, one of the best I have ever interviewed isn’t actually a Founder. He is the longest serving employee at @Uber. Andrew MacDonald. He rarely does interviews and this was the most insane behind the scenes at one of the worlds largest companies: - Spending $52M per week in China - Lessons from Travis Kalanick - Why autonomy is existential - How AI helps and hurts Uber There was so much in this, I took notes and have added them below: 1. How Does Uber Decide What New Products to Do Versus Not Do? At nearly $250 billion in gross bookings, new mobility or delivery products must show a credible path to billions in transaction volume within a few years to justify organizational resources. Anything smaller risks being swallowed by the demands of the core business. 2. How Companies Need to Extract AI Efficiency Measuring AI ROI on a per-employee basis is nearly impossible because saved hours simply get absorbed by other work. Instead, leaders should capture efficiency through OpEx by capping or reducing headcount targets and requiring teams to produce more with existing resources. 3. Uber Have a SWAT Team of the Best AI Engineers Uber created a dedicated pod of 30 elite AI engineers paired directly with G&A teams and business process owners. By rebuilding workflows from the ground up, they cut weekly pricing processes from 15 hours to two and marketing QA from two weeks to two days. 4. Why We Were Right to Focus on Core Strategy and Divest the Autonomy Business at the Time When COVID erased 84% of Uber’s mobility revenue in three weeks, the company divested its ATG autonomous driving unit. Exiting a capital-intensive race where Uber trailed competitors freed the company to focus on turning its core marketplace into a cash-flowing machine. 5. Will Uber Have More or Fewer Employees in Five Years’ Time? While AI will create entirely new industries, execution-heavy enterprise functions will see significant headcount contraction. Roles centered on customer support, sales ops, content production, and reporting analytics will face substantial augmentation and partial replacement by AI agents. 6. Crazy Story Number One From Working in China At the peak of its market-share war with DiDi in China, Uber burned $52 million per week on price subsidies alone. Competing without access to WeChat made winning nearly impossible, but aggressive capital deployment gave Uber the leverage needed to negotiate a successful local exit. 7. Single Biggest Lesson From Travis Kalanick Travis Kalanick’s operational superpower was walking into a meeting, asking pointed questions, and advancing weeks of expert thinking in 15 minutes. Great leaders create leverage by constantly exercising this problem-solving muscle and teaching the principles behind their decisions. (links in comments) @andrewgordonmac
I have interviewed 1,000 of the best operators of the last 10 years. Ironically, one of the best I have ever interviewed isn’t actually a Founder. He is the longest serving employee at @Uber. Andrew MacDonald. He rarely does interviews and this was the most insane behind the scenes at one of the worlds largest companies: - Spending $52M per week in China - Lessons from Travis Kalanick - Why autonomy is existential - How AI helps and hurts Uber There was so much in this, I took notes and have added them below: 1. How Does Uber Decide What New Products to Do Versus Not Do? At nearly $250 billion in gross bookings, new mobility or delivery products must show a credible path to billions in transaction volume within a few years to justify organizational resources. Anything smaller risks being swallowed by the demands of the core business. 2. How Companies Need to Extract AI Efficiency Measuring AI ROI on a per-employee basis is nearly impossible because saved hours simply get absorbed by other work. Instead, leaders should capture efficiency through OpEx by capping or reducing headcount targets and requiring teams to produce more with existing resources. 3. Uber Have a SWAT Team of the Best AI Engineers Uber created a dedicated pod of 30 elite AI engineers paired directly with G&A teams and business process owners. By rebuilding workflows from the ground up, they cut weekly pricing processes from 15 hours to two and marketing QA from two weeks to two days. 4. Why We Were Right to Focus on Core Strategy and Divest the Autonomy Business at the Time When COVID erased 84% of Uber’s mobility revenue in three weeks, the company divested its ATG autonomous driving unit. Exiting a capital-intensive race where Uber trailed competitors freed the company to focus on turning its core marketplace into a cash-flowing machine. 5. Will Uber Have More or Fewer Employees in Five Years’ Time? While AI will create entirely new industries, execution-heavy enterprise functions will see significant headcount contraction. Roles centered on customer support, sales ops, content production, and reporting analytics will face substantial augmentation and partial replacement by AI agents. 6. Crazy Story Number One From Working in China At the peak of its market-share war with DiDi in China, Uber burned $52 million per week on price subsidies alone. Competing without access to WeChat made winning nearly impossible, but aggressive capital deployment gave Uber the leverage needed to negotiate a successful local exit. 7. Single Biggest Lesson From Travis Kalanick Travis Kalanick’s operational superpower was walking into a meeting, asking pointed questions, and advancing weeks of expert thinking in 15 minutes. Great leaders create leverage by constantly exercising this problem-solving muscle and teaching the principles behind their decisions. (links in comments) @andrewgordonmac
@Uber Spotify 👉 open.spotify.com/episode/3pGXxX… Youtube 👉 youtu.be/sCa1MWB9Gcc Apple Podcasts 👉 podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/20v…
I have interviewed 1,000 of the best operators of the last 10 years. Ironically, one of the best I have ever interviewed isn’t actually a Founder. He is the longest serving employee at @Uber. Andrew MacDonald. He rarely does interviews and this was the most insane behind the scenes at one of the worlds largest companies: - Spending $52M per week in China - Lessons from Travis Kalanick - Why autonomy is existential - How AI helps and hurts Uber There was so much in this, I took notes and have added them below: 1. How Does Uber Decide What New Products to Do Versus Not Do? At nearly $250 billion in gross bookings, new mobility or delivery products must show a credible path to billions in transaction volume within a few years to justify organizational resources. Anything smaller risks being swallowed by the demands of the core business. 2. How Companies Need to Extract AI Efficiency Measuring AI ROI on a per-employee basis is nearly impossible because saved hours simply get absorbed by other work. Instead, leaders should capture efficiency through OpEx by capping or reducing headcount targets and requiring teams to produce more with existing resources. 3. Uber Have a SWAT Team of the Best AI Engineers Uber created a dedicated pod of 30 elite AI engineers paired directly with G&A teams and business process owners. By rebuilding workflows from the ground up, they cut weekly pricing processes from 15 hours to two and marketing QA from two weeks to two days. 4. Why We Were Right to Focus on Core Strategy and Divest the Autonomy Business at the Time When COVID erased 84% of Uber’s mobility revenue in three weeks, the company divested its ATG autonomous driving unit. Exiting a capital-intensive race where Uber trailed competitors freed the company to focus on turning its core marketplace into a cash-flowing machine. 5. Will Uber Have More or Fewer Employees in Five Years’ Time? While AI will create entirely new industries, execution-heavy enterprise functions will see significant headcount contraction. Roles centered on customer support, sales ops, content production, and reporting analytics will face substantial augmentation and partial replacement by AI agents. 6. Crazy Story Number One From Working in China At the peak of its market-share war with DiDi in China, Uber burned $52 million per week on price subsidies alone. Competing without access to WeChat made winning nearly impossible, but aggressive capital deployment gave Uber the leverage needed to negotiate a successful local exit. 7. Single Biggest Lesson From Travis Kalanick Travis Kalanick’s operational superpower was walking into a meeting, asking pointed questions, and advancing weeks of expert thinking in 15 minutes. Great leaders create leverage by constantly exercising this problem-solving muscle and teaching the principles behind their decisions. (links in comments) @andrewgordonmac
@Uber Spotify 👉 open.spotify.com/episode/3pGXxX… Youtube 👉 youtu.be/sCa1MWB9Gcc Apple Podcasts 👉 podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/20v…
The AI sponsorship system that invests millions of dollars without any humans "The workflow is a self-improving loop. My agent knows that this is a newsletter request, asks for their rates, researches their audience, and does that first part of negotiation for me. It ingests all of the cost data, does copywriting, creates all the links and conversion tracking, and sends everything out to the partner. It knows what performance looks like and can say, 'Do we continue on with the partner?' The next time it generates copy, it's based on all historic data." @MattSwulinski
Harry Stebbings@HarryStebbings·I have interviewed 100 of the best growth leaders in the world. @MattSwulinski is easily top 3. (alongside @alexschultz and Brian Hale) He scaled Wispr Flow to over $100M in ARR and built a UGC machine. He scaled Superhuman from founder personally onboarding every customer to a growth machine with $50M ARR. If you are an early stage founder or growth leader, this will be the best episode you will listen to this year! I condensed my biggest lessons from the discussion below: 1. The E-Commerce Playbook Is the Right Playbook for SaaS The e-commerce playbook, where every dollar spent ties directly to a purchase or conversion, is the right model for modern SaaS. With distribution becoming a critical moat in a crowded AI market, SaaS companies should deploy UGC creators, constantly test new creative, and diversify channels to build their brand. 2. Paid Acquisition Is the Fastest Way to Validate PLG Relying solely on organic content and word-of-mouth takes too long to validate product-market fit. Paid acquisition creates the fastest feedback loop for proving a PLG funnel works, allowing teams to test positioning, refine messaging, and optimize conversion within a single week. 3. You Only Need Three Core Channels to Scale to $10M ARR Startups often ruin their acquisition engines by trying to run ten channels poorly at once. Reaching the first $10M in ARR only requires mastering three core channels: video intent on Meta, search intent on Google, and lifecycle retention through email and SMS. 4. Scaling Paid Ads Requires 500 New Creatives Every Single Month On platforms like Meta, creative increasingly acts as the targeting algorithm. Scaling spend without hitting audience fatigue requires 400 to 500 new creative assets every month, produced through UGC revenue-share programs, specialized agencies, and internal teams. 5. How the Best Growth Leaders Test for True Spend Incrementally Blindly increasing ad spend wastes money on conversions that may have happened organically. The best growth leaders measure spend elasticity against ARR growth and run strict holdout tests to determine whether each additional dollar generates genuinely incremental revenue. 6. In Three Years, Companies Will Operate Like a Board of Directors Tech organizations are shifting away from manual execution. Within three years, lean human teams could operate more like boards of directors, spending 20% of their time on strategy while autonomous AI agents handle 80% of operational execution. 7. Fire Your Marketing Team if They Aren’t Systems Thinkers Marketers focused on repetitive manual tasks are becoming increasingly replaceable. High-performing teams need systems thinkers who can break their work into inputs and outputs, then build self-improving AI workflows that multiply their personal leverage by 10x. (links in comments)
How to crush answer engine optimization and rank #1 in ChatGPT "The most important thing is YouTube, Reddit, and the social narrative. YouTube reviews, because they're long-form and rank long-tail, are one of the main things that get picked up by the answer engine. They're a really high citation on ChatGPT, and that's one of the early, strong things that every founder should focus on." @MattSwulinski Single biggest advice to startup founders on how to crush answer engine optimization @andrewyan200 @chriswandrew @thejamescad @MariusMeiners
Harry Stebbings@HarryStebbings·I have interviewed 100 of the best growth leaders in the world. @MattSwulinski is easily top 3. (alongside @alexschultz and Brian Hale) He scaled Wispr Flow to over $100M in ARR and built a UGC machine. He scaled Superhuman from founder personally onboarding every customer to a growth machine with $50M ARR. If you are an early stage founder or growth leader, this will be the best episode you will listen to this year! I condensed my biggest lessons from the discussion below: 1. The E-Commerce Playbook Is the Right Playbook for SaaS The e-commerce playbook, where every dollar spent ties directly to a purchase or conversion, is the right model for modern SaaS. With distribution becoming a critical moat in a crowded AI market, SaaS companies should deploy UGC creators, constantly test new creative, and diversify channels to build their brand. 2. Paid Acquisition Is the Fastest Way to Validate PLG Relying solely on organic content and word-of-mouth takes too long to validate product-market fit. Paid acquisition creates the fastest feedback loop for proving a PLG funnel works, allowing teams to test positioning, refine messaging, and optimize conversion within a single week. 3. You Only Need Three Core Channels to Scale to $10M ARR Startups often ruin their acquisition engines by trying to run ten channels poorly at once. Reaching the first $10M in ARR only requires mastering three core channels: video intent on Meta, search intent on Google, and lifecycle retention through email and SMS. 4. Scaling Paid Ads Requires 500 New Creatives Every Single Month On platforms like Meta, creative increasingly acts as the targeting algorithm. Scaling spend without hitting audience fatigue requires 400 to 500 new creative assets every month, produced through UGC revenue-share programs, specialized agencies, and internal teams. 5. How the Best Growth Leaders Test for True Spend Incrementally Blindly increasing ad spend wastes money on conversions that may have happened organically. The best growth leaders measure spend elasticity against ARR growth and run strict holdout tests to determine whether each additional dollar generates genuinely incremental revenue. 6. In Three Years, Companies Will Operate Like a Board of Directors Tech organizations are shifting away from manual execution. Within three years, lean human teams could operate more like boards of directors, spending 20% of their time on strategy while autonomous AI agents handle 80% of operational execution. 7. Fire Your Marketing Team if They Aren’t Systems Thinkers Marketers focused on repetitive manual tasks are becoming increasingly replaceable. High-performing teams need systems thinkers who can break their work into inputs and outputs, then build self-improving AI workflows that multiply their personal leverage by 10x. (links in comments)
Kids are making 20-30K doing clips for us. "The kids are making bank nowadays doing UGC for brands that will pay them a percentage of ad spend. Some are 17, 18, 19 years old, making $20,000 to $30,000 a month just making a couple of ads for us. If we keep spending on it and it's a great ad, they don't have to make another one for a while." @MattSwulinski
Harry Stebbings@HarryStebbings·I have interviewed 100 of the best growth leaders in the world. @MattSwulinski is easily top 3. (alongside @alexschultz and Brian Hale) He scaled Wispr Flow to over $100M in ARR and built a UGC machine. He scaled Superhuman from founder personally onboarding every customer to a growth machine with $50M ARR. If you are an early stage founder or growth leader, this will be the best episode you will listen to this year! I condensed my biggest lessons from the discussion below: 1. The E-Commerce Playbook Is the Right Playbook for SaaS The e-commerce playbook, where every dollar spent ties directly to a purchase or conversion, is the right model for modern SaaS. With distribution becoming a critical moat in a crowded AI market, SaaS companies should deploy UGC creators, constantly test new creative, and diversify channels to build their brand. 2. Paid Acquisition Is the Fastest Way to Validate PLG Relying solely on organic content and word-of-mouth takes too long to validate product-market fit. Paid acquisition creates the fastest feedback loop for proving a PLG funnel works, allowing teams to test positioning, refine messaging, and optimize conversion within a single week. 3. You Only Need Three Core Channels to Scale to $10M ARR Startups often ruin their acquisition engines by trying to run ten channels poorly at once. Reaching the first $10M in ARR only requires mastering three core channels: video intent on Meta, search intent on Google, and lifecycle retention through email and SMS. 4. Scaling Paid Ads Requires 500 New Creatives Every Single Month On platforms like Meta, creative increasingly acts as the targeting algorithm. Scaling spend without hitting audience fatigue requires 400 to 500 new creative assets every month, produced through UGC revenue-share programs, specialized agencies, and internal teams. 5. How the Best Growth Leaders Test for True Spend Incrementally Blindly increasing ad spend wastes money on conversions that may have happened organically. The best growth leaders measure spend elasticity against ARR growth and run strict holdout tests to determine whether each additional dollar generates genuinely incremental revenue. 6. In Three Years, Companies Will Operate Like a Board of Directors Tech organizations are shifting away from manual execution. Within three years, lean human teams could operate more like boards of directors, spending 20% of their time on strategy while autonomous AI agents handle 80% of operational execution. 7. Fire Your Marketing Team if They Aren’t Systems Thinkers Marketers focused on repetitive manual tasks are becoming increasingly replaceable. High-performing teams need systems thinkers who can break their work into inputs and outputs, then build self-improving AI workflows that multiply their personal leverage by 10x. (links in comments)
"You probably need at least 400 to 500 new creatives a month. Otherwise, you're going to get outcompeted. Once they do that, they create three to four videos a week, and we have a couple hundred of them. We work with five agencies. E-commerce has been doing this for over a decade. UGC, creator programs, hundreds of thousands of variations of creative." @MattSwulinski Single biggest advice to founders on how to crush UGC at scale @roman_khaves @im_roy_lee @zach_yadegari
Harry Stebbings@HarryStebbings·I have interviewed 100 of the best growth leaders in the world. @MattSwulinski is easily top 3. (alongside @alexschultz and Brian Hale) He scaled Wispr Flow to over $100M in ARR and built a UGC machine. He scaled Superhuman from founder personally onboarding every customer to a growth machine with $50M ARR. If you are an early stage founder or growth leader, this will be the best episode you will listen to this year! I condensed my biggest lessons from the discussion below: 1. The E-Commerce Playbook Is the Right Playbook for SaaS The e-commerce playbook, where every dollar spent ties directly to a purchase or conversion, is the right model for modern SaaS. With distribution becoming a critical moat in a crowded AI market, SaaS companies should deploy UGC creators, constantly test new creative, and diversify channels to build their brand. 2. Paid Acquisition Is the Fastest Way to Validate PLG Relying solely on organic content and word-of-mouth takes too long to validate product-market fit. Paid acquisition creates the fastest feedback loop for proving a PLG funnel works, allowing teams to test positioning, refine messaging, and optimize conversion within a single week. 3. You Only Need Three Core Channels to Scale to $10M ARR Startups often ruin their acquisition engines by trying to run ten channels poorly at once. Reaching the first $10M in ARR only requires mastering three core channels: video intent on Meta, search intent on Google, and lifecycle retention through email and SMS. 4. Scaling Paid Ads Requires 500 New Creatives Every Single Month On platforms like Meta, creative increasingly acts as the targeting algorithm. Scaling spend without hitting audience fatigue requires 400 to 500 new creative assets every month, produced through UGC revenue-share programs, specialized agencies, and internal teams. 5. How the Best Growth Leaders Test for True Spend Incrementally Blindly increasing ad spend wastes money on conversions that may have happened organically. The best growth leaders measure spend elasticity against ARR growth and run strict holdout tests to determine whether each additional dollar generates genuinely incremental revenue. 6. In Three Years, Companies Will Operate Like a Board of Directors Tech organizations are shifting away from manual execution. Within three years, lean human teams could operate more like boards of directors, spending 20% of their time on strategy while autonomous AI agents handle 80% of operational execution. 7. Fire Your Marketing Team if They Aren’t Systems Thinkers Marketers focused on repetitive manual tasks are becoming increasingly replaceable. High-performing teams need systems thinkers who can break their work into inputs and outputs, then build self-improving AI workflows that multiply their personal leverage by 10x. (links in comments)
"There are the core three of any acquisition engine: Meta, Google, and lifecycle. You can scale to your first million, $10 million ARR just off of those three things. If you do a million channels and you do them all poorly, it's not going to help you out." @MattSwulinski Single biggest advice to founders on channel selection, when to expand and when not to @alexschultz @kippbodnar @searchbrat
Harry Stebbings@HarryStebbings·I have interviewed 100 of the best growth leaders in the world. @MattSwulinski is easily top 3. (alongside @alexschultz and Brian Hale) He scaled Wispr Flow to over $100M in ARR and built a UGC machine. He scaled Superhuman from founder personally onboarding every customer to a growth machine with $50M ARR. If you are an early stage founder or growth leader, this will be the best episode you will listen to this year! I condensed my biggest lessons from the discussion below: 1. The E-Commerce Playbook Is the Right Playbook for SaaS The e-commerce playbook, where every dollar spent ties directly to a purchase or conversion, is the right model for modern SaaS. With distribution becoming a critical moat in a crowded AI market, SaaS companies should deploy UGC creators, constantly test new creative, and diversify channels to build their brand. 2. Paid Acquisition Is the Fastest Way to Validate PLG Relying solely on organic content and word-of-mouth takes too long to validate product-market fit. Paid acquisition creates the fastest feedback loop for proving a PLG funnel works, allowing teams to test positioning, refine messaging, and optimize conversion within a single week. 3. You Only Need Three Core Channels to Scale to $10M ARR Startups often ruin their acquisition engines by trying to run ten channels poorly at once. Reaching the first $10M in ARR only requires mastering three core channels: video intent on Meta, search intent on Google, and lifecycle retention through email and SMS. 4. Scaling Paid Ads Requires 500 New Creatives Every Single Month On platforms like Meta, creative increasingly acts as the targeting algorithm. Scaling spend without hitting audience fatigue requires 400 to 500 new creative assets every month, produced through UGC revenue-share programs, specialized agencies, and internal teams. 5. How the Best Growth Leaders Test for True Spend Incrementally Blindly increasing ad spend wastes money on conversions that may have happened organically. The best growth leaders measure spend elasticity against ARR growth and run strict holdout tests to determine whether each additional dollar generates genuinely incremental revenue. 6. In Three Years, Companies Will Operate Like a Board of Directors Tech organizations are shifting away from manual execution. Within three years, lean human teams could operate more like boards of directors, spending 20% of their time on strategy while autonomous AI agents handle 80% of operational execution. 7. Fire Your Marketing Team if They Aren’t Systems Thinkers Marketers focused on repetitive manual tasks are becoming increasingly replaceable. High-performing teams need systems thinkers who can break their work into inputs and outputs, then build self-improving AI workflows that multiply their personal leverage by 10x. (links in comments)
"Paid is the easiest way to validate that you have PLG, that you have a product that can scale in any way, shape, or form. You can refine messaging, do creative testing, test your funnels, and test your positioning, all within a week on paid. Do all of that, but then you have a much faster engine of validation on the paid amplification end." @MattSwulinski Do you agree you should do paid as soon as possible @tomerlondon @AravSrinivas @awxjack
Harry Stebbings@HarryStebbings·I have interviewed 100 of the best growth leaders in the world. @MattSwulinski is easily top 3. (alongside @alexschultz and Brian Hale) He scaled Wispr Flow to over $100M in ARR and built a UGC machine. He scaled Superhuman from founder personally onboarding every customer to a growth machine with $50M ARR. If you are an early stage founder or growth leader, this will be the best episode you will listen to this year! I condensed my biggest lessons from the discussion below: 1. The E-Commerce Playbook Is the Right Playbook for SaaS The e-commerce playbook, where every dollar spent ties directly to a purchase or conversion, is the right model for modern SaaS. With distribution becoming a critical moat in a crowded AI market, SaaS companies should deploy UGC creators, constantly test new creative, and diversify channels to build their brand. 2. Paid Acquisition Is the Fastest Way to Validate PLG Relying solely on organic content and word-of-mouth takes too long to validate product-market fit. Paid acquisition creates the fastest feedback loop for proving a PLG funnel works, allowing teams to test positioning, refine messaging, and optimize conversion within a single week. 3. You Only Need Three Core Channels to Scale to $10M ARR Startups often ruin their acquisition engines by trying to run ten channels poorly at once. Reaching the first $10M in ARR only requires mastering three core channels: video intent on Meta, search intent on Google, and lifecycle retention through email and SMS. 4. Scaling Paid Ads Requires 500 New Creatives Every Single Month On platforms like Meta, creative increasingly acts as the targeting algorithm. Scaling spend without hitting audience fatigue requires 400 to 500 new creative assets every month, produced through UGC revenue-share programs, specialized agencies, and internal teams. 5. How the Best Growth Leaders Test for True Spend Incrementally Blindly increasing ad spend wastes money on conversions that may have happened organically. The best growth leaders measure spend elasticity against ARR growth and run strict holdout tests to determine whether each additional dollar generates genuinely incremental revenue. 6. In Three Years, Companies Will Operate Like a Board of Directors Tech organizations are shifting away from manual execution. Within three years, lean human teams could operate more like boards of directors, spending 20% of their time on strategy while autonomous AI agents handle 80% of operational execution. 7. Fire Your Marketing Team if They Aren’t Systems Thinkers Marketers focused on repetitive manual tasks are becoming increasingly replaceable. High-performing teams need systems thinkers who can break their work into inputs and outputs, then build self-improving AI workflows that multiply their personal leverage by 10x. (links in comments)
"My philosophy is that the e-commerce playbook is the right playbook for SaaS. Every single cent needs to equal a purchase or an add to cart. You have hundreds of UGC creators, a variety of creative, and a ton of channels that you're essentially balancing to showcase the entirety of the brand. Distribution to me is the only moat." @MattSwulinski Do you agree, SaaS must adopt the Ecom playbook when it comes to growth and paid marketing @ElenaVerna @onecaseman @itsalfredw @melvinhagberg
Harry Stebbings@HarryStebbings·I have interviewed 100 of the best growth leaders in the world. @MattSwulinski is easily top 3. (alongside @alexschultz and Brian Hale) He scaled Wispr Flow to over $100M in ARR and built a UGC machine. He scaled Superhuman from founder personally onboarding every customer to a growth machine with $50M ARR. If you are an early stage founder or growth leader, this will be the best episode you will listen to this year! I condensed my biggest lessons from the discussion below: 1. The E-Commerce Playbook Is the Right Playbook for SaaS The e-commerce playbook, where every dollar spent ties directly to a purchase or conversion, is the right model for modern SaaS. With distribution becoming a critical moat in a crowded AI market, SaaS companies should deploy UGC creators, constantly test new creative, and diversify channels to build their brand. 2. Paid Acquisition Is the Fastest Way to Validate PLG Relying solely on organic content and word-of-mouth takes too long to validate product-market fit. Paid acquisition creates the fastest feedback loop for proving a PLG funnel works, allowing teams to test positioning, refine messaging, and optimize conversion within a single week. 3. You Only Need Three Core Channels to Scale to $10M ARR Startups often ruin their acquisition engines by trying to run ten channels poorly at once. Reaching the first $10M in ARR only requires mastering three core channels: video intent on Meta, search intent on Google, and lifecycle retention through email and SMS. 4. Scaling Paid Ads Requires 500 New Creatives Every Single Month On platforms like Meta, creative increasingly acts as the targeting algorithm. Scaling spend without hitting audience fatigue requires 400 to 500 new creative assets every month, produced through UGC revenue-share programs, specialized agencies, and internal teams. 5. How the Best Growth Leaders Test for True Spend Incrementally Blindly increasing ad spend wastes money on conversions that may have happened organically. The best growth leaders measure spend elasticity against ARR growth and run strict holdout tests to determine whether each additional dollar generates genuinely incremental revenue. 6. In Three Years, Companies Will Operate Like a Board of Directors Tech organizations are shifting away from manual execution. Within three years, lean human teams could operate more like boards of directors, spending 20% of their time on strategy while autonomous AI agents handle 80% of operational execution. 7. Fire Your Marketing Team if They Aren’t Systems Thinkers Marketers focused on repetitive manual tasks are becoming increasingly replaceable. High-performing teams need systems thinkers who can break their work into inputs and outputs, then build self-improving AI workflows that multiply their personal leverage by 10x. (links in comments)
I have interviewed 100 of the best growth leaders in the world. @MattSwulinski is easily top 3. (alongside @alexschultz and Brian Hale) He scaled Wispr Flow to over $100M in ARR and built a UGC machine. He scaled Superhuman from founder personally onboarding every customer to a growth machine with $50M ARR. If you are an early stage founder or growth leader, this will be the best episode you will listen to this year! I condensed my biggest lessons from the discussion below: 1. The E-Commerce Playbook Is the Right Playbook for SaaS The e-commerce playbook, where every dollar spent ties directly to a purchase or conversion, is the right model for modern SaaS. With distribution becoming a critical moat in a crowded AI market, SaaS companies should deploy UGC creators, constantly test new creative, and diversify channels to build their brand. 2. Paid Acquisition Is the Fastest Way to Validate PLG Relying solely on organic content and word-of-mouth takes too long to validate product-market fit. Paid acquisition creates the fastest feedback loop for proving a PLG funnel works, allowing teams to test positioning, refine messaging, and optimize conversion within a single week. 3. You Only Need Three Core Channels to Scale to $10M ARR Startups often ruin their acquisition engines by trying to run ten channels poorly at once. Reaching the first $10M in ARR only requires mastering three core channels: video intent on Meta, search intent on Google, and lifecycle retention through email and SMS. 4. Scaling Paid Ads Requires 500 New Creatives Every Single Month On platforms like Meta, creative increasingly acts as the targeting algorithm. Scaling spend without hitting audience fatigue requires 400 to 500 new creative assets every month, produced through UGC revenue-share programs, specialized agencies, and internal teams. 5. How the Best Growth Leaders Test for True Spend Incrementally Blindly increasing ad spend wastes money on conversions that may have happened organically. The best growth leaders measure spend elasticity against ARR growth and run strict holdout tests to determine whether each additional dollar generates genuinely incremental revenue. 6. In Three Years, Companies Will Operate Like a Board of Directors Tech organizations are shifting away from manual execution. Within three years, lean human teams could operate more like boards of directors, spending 20% of their time on strategy while autonomous AI agents handle 80% of operational execution. 7. Fire Your Marketing Team if They Aren’t Systems Thinkers Marketers focused on repetitive manual tasks are becoming increasingly replaceable. High-performing teams need systems thinkers who can break their work into inputs and outputs, then build self-improving AI workflows that multiply their personal leverage by 10x. (links in comments)
Spotify 👉open.spotify.com/episode/0KgggH… Youtube 👉youtu.be/bm8rMM4Bxz8?si… Apple Podcasts 👉podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/20g…
"Any investment I've made that is not run by a founder is going to be a zero in this age. If the price of me not having a zero is getting Nick to 40%, I wish I was a shareholder. That's the price I'm gonna pay in a heartbeat. I believe every non-founder has run my portfolio companies into the ground." @jasonlk From angel investing; do you agree when the founder leaves it is 99% of the time zero @PalmerLuckey @howietl @typesfast @rabois
Harry Stebbings@HarryStebbings·There are three ugly truths right now that we are not admitting. 1. The valuations we have from 2021 are representative of true value today. Airtable was valued at $11Bn and sold for $2BN. Canva was valued at $44BN and now is slashing growth targets and getting cannibalised by OpenAI. 2. That any of our companies can actually hire A* talent when they are competing against the might of compensation packages from OpenAI and Anthropic. Demis Hassabis and Jeff Dean do not even stick with the talent exodus from Google. 3. Dilution is worse than it has ever been. SBC is higher than it has ever been. Investor returns will be hit. We will see CEO “superhero pay packets” like Nik @ Revolut and Elon Musk’s normalise. We discuss all of this and more in the best podcast you will listen to this week with @jasonlk & @rodriscoll. My notes below: 1. Any Investment Where the Founder Leaves, I Write It to Zero In the fast-moving AI era, non-founder executives often lack the agility, vision, and obsession required to navigate existential platform shifts. When a founder steps away, late-stage software companies risk losing their willingness to make radical pivots, turning once-promising portfolio stars into functional zeros. 2. How Much Is Canva Truly Worth Today? Even category-defining software companies face sharp valuation compression when growth slows from 30% to 20% while AI inference and serving costs rise. As markets penalize margin degradation and subsidized AI features, private-market valuations are rapidly resetting toward lower public-market revenue multiples. 3. Insane Levels of Dilution Are Killing Returns Extreme dilution and inflated entry prices are structurally compressing venture returns across both seed and late stages. Investors may need to model for up to 75% dilution and effectively 4x their initial entry price to understand realistic outcomes, forcing a rethink of traditional power-law math. 4. Paying the Bill in ’26 for ’23 Hesitancy When generational platform shifts happen, hesitation compounds. Incumbents and investors that failed to make aggressive architectural and product bets on AI in 2023 may pay for that caution through competitive displacement and revenue erosion in 2026 and 2027. 5. The Only Way You Prove That You’re Not Dying Is by Growing In a market dominated by AI displacement narratives and short-seller memes, verbal defenses and incremental product updates mean little. The only way software companies can silence existential narratives and defend their valuation multiples is by delivering undeniable top-line growth. 6. Liquidity Will Only Come at the End of the Journey Private-market investing requires LPs and founders to endure years of valuation volatility. Interim markdowns and market anxiety matter far less than the ultimate outcome. Meaningful liquidity often arrives only after a company successfully navigates the platform shift and reaches maturity. 7. They Say It’s Not About the Money, It’s About the Money Despite rhetoric around mission, public benefit, and governance, financial incentives still drive executive decisions and talent retention. In a hyper-competitive AI market, keeping true superstars requires “god-tier” compensation packages that go far beyond traditional corporate pay structures. (links in comments)
"Outcomes are being massively compressed by unprecedented dilution and high entry prices. When I started, my model was, 'I'm actually paying twice my entry price.' Now it's 4x. Now I'm going to suffer 75% dilution." @jasonlk Are we going to see venture performance impacted by insane levels of dilution @mmurph @dafrankel @pitdesi @yrechtman
Harry Stebbings@HarryStebbings·There are three ugly truths right now that we are not admitting. 1. The valuations we have from 2021 are representative of true value today. Airtable was valued at $11Bn and sold for $2BN. Canva was valued at $44BN and now is slashing growth targets and getting cannibalised by OpenAI. 2. That any of our companies can actually hire A* talent when they are competing against the might of compensation packages from OpenAI and Anthropic. Demis Hassabis and Jeff Dean do not even stick with the talent exodus from Google. 3. Dilution is worse than it has ever been. SBC is higher than it has ever been. Investor returns will be hit. We will see CEO “superhero pay packets” like Nik @ Revolut and Elon Musk’s normalise. We discuss all of this and more in the best podcast you will listen to this week with @jasonlk & @rodriscoll. My notes below: 1. Any Investment Where the Founder Leaves, I Write It to Zero In the fast-moving AI era, non-founder executives often lack the agility, vision, and obsession required to navigate existential platform shifts. When a founder steps away, late-stage software companies risk losing their willingness to make radical pivots, turning once-promising portfolio stars into functional zeros. 2. How Much Is Canva Truly Worth Today? Even category-defining software companies face sharp valuation compression when growth slows from 30% to 20% while AI inference and serving costs rise. As markets penalize margin degradation and subsidized AI features, private-market valuations are rapidly resetting toward lower public-market revenue multiples. 3. Insane Levels of Dilution Are Killing Returns Extreme dilution and inflated entry prices are structurally compressing venture returns across both seed and late stages. Investors may need to model for up to 75% dilution and effectively 4x their initial entry price to understand realistic outcomes, forcing a rethink of traditional power-law math. 4. Paying the Bill in ’26 for ’23 Hesitancy When generational platform shifts happen, hesitation compounds. Incumbents and investors that failed to make aggressive architectural and product bets on AI in 2023 may pay for that caution through competitive displacement and revenue erosion in 2026 and 2027. 5. The Only Way You Prove That You’re Not Dying Is by Growing In a market dominated by AI displacement narratives and short-seller memes, verbal defenses and incremental product updates mean little. The only way software companies can silence existential narratives and defend their valuation multiples is by delivering undeniable top-line growth. 6. Liquidity Will Only Come at the End of the Journey Private-market investing requires LPs and founders to endure years of valuation volatility. Interim markdowns and market anxiety matter far less than the ultimate outcome. Meaningful liquidity often arrives only after a company successfully navigates the platform shift and reaches maturity. 7. They Say It’s Not About the Money, It’s About the Money Despite rhetoric around mission, public benefit, and governance, financial incentives still drive executive decisions and talent retention. In a hyper-competitive AI market, keeping true superstars requires “god-tier” compensation packages that go far beyond traditional corporate pay structures. (links in comments)
"We're now seeing three bands of compensation: regular human beings, the AI guys, and the one to five superstars. We have to provide them everything: the outsized equity, the outsized cash. If you're doing $200M in revenue, you can have four god-tier employees. It's not gonna break your model." @jasonlk Do you have a god-tier comp layer for the very best AI talent and what do you advise founders on this @immad @itsalfredw @blader @dharmesh @tolson
Harry Stebbings@HarryStebbings·There are three ugly truths right now that we are not admitting. 1. The valuations we have from 2021 are representative of true value today. Airtable was valued at $11Bn and sold for $2BN. Canva was valued at $44BN and now is slashing growth targets and getting cannibalised by OpenAI. 2. That any of our companies can actually hire A* talent when they are competing against the might of compensation packages from OpenAI and Anthropic. Demis Hassabis and Jeff Dean do not even stick with the talent exodus from Google. 3. Dilution is worse than it has ever been. SBC is higher than it has ever been. Investor returns will be hit. We will see CEO “superhero pay packets” like Nik @ Revolut and Elon Musk’s normalise. We discuss all of this and more in the best podcast you will listen to this week with @jasonlk & @rodriscoll. My notes below: 1. Any Investment Where the Founder Leaves, I Write It to Zero In the fast-moving AI era, non-founder executives often lack the agility, vision, and obsession required to navigate existential platform shifts. When a founder steps away, late-stage software companies risk losing their willingness to make radical pivots, turning once-promising portfolio stars into functional zeros. 2. How Much Is Canva Truly Worth Today? Even category-defining software companies face sharp valuation compression when growth slows from 30% to 20% while AI inference and serving costs rise. As markets penalize margin degradation and subsidized AI features, private-market valuations are rapidly resetting toward lower public-market revenue multiples. 3. Insane Levels of Dilution Are Killing Returns Extreme dilution and inflated entry prices are structurally compressing venture returns across both seed and late stages. Investors may need to model for up to 75% dilution and effectively 4x their initial entry price to understand realistic outcomes, forcing a rethink of traditional power-law math. 4. Paying the Bill in ’26 for ’23 Hesitancy When generational platform shifts happen, hesitation compounds. Incumbents and investors that failed to make aggressive architectural and product bets on AI in 2023 may pay for that caution through competitive displacement and revenue erosion in 2026 and 2027. 5. The Only Way You Prove That You’re Not Dying Is by Growing In a market dominated by AI displacement narratives and short-seller memes, verbal defenses and incremental product updates mean little. The only way software companies can silence existential narratives and defend their valuation multiples is by delivering undeniable top-line growth. 6. Liquidity Will Only Come at the End of the Journey Private-market investing requires LPs and founders to endure years of valuation volatility. Interim markdowns and market anxiety matter far less than the ultimate outcome. Meaningful liquidity often arrives only after a company successfully navigates the platform shift and reaches maturity. 7. They Say It’s Not About the Money, It’s About the Money Despite rhetoric around mission, public benefit, and governance, financial incentives still drive executive decisions and talent retention. In a hyper-competitive AI market, keeping true superstars requires “god-tier” compensation packages that go far beyond traditional corporate pay structures. (links in comments)
There are three ugly truths right now that we are not admitting. 1. The valuations we have from 2021 are representative of true value today. Airtable was valued at $11Bn and sold for $2BN. Canva was valued at $44BN and now is slashing growth targets and getting cannibalised by OpenAI. 2. That any of our companies can actually hire A* talent when they are competing against the might of compensation packages from OpenAI and Anthropic. Demis Hassabis and Jeff Dean do not even stick with the talent exodus from Google. 3. Dilution is worse than it has ever been. SBC is higher than it has ever been. Investor returns will be hit. We will see CEO “superhero pay packets” like Nik @ Revolut and Elon Musk’s normalise. We discuss all of this and more in the best podcast you will listen to this week with @jasonlk & @rodriscoll. My notes below: 1. Any Investment Where the Founder Leaves, I Write It to Zero In the fast-moving AI era, non-founder executives often lack the agility, vision, and obsession required to navigate existential platform shifts. When a founder steps away, late-stage software companies risk losing their willingness to make radical pivots, turning once-promising portfolio stars into functional zeros. 2. How Much Is Canva Truly Worth Today? Even category-defining software companies face sharp valuation compression when growth slows from 30% to 20% while AI inference and serving costs rise. As markets penalize margin degradation and subsidized AI features, private-market valuations are rapidly resetting toward lower public-market revenue multiples. 3. Insane Levels of Dilution Are Killing Returns Extreme dilution and inflated entry prices are structurally compressing venture returns across both seed and late stages. Investors may need to model for up to 75% dilution and effectively 4x their initial entry price to understand realistic outcomes, forcing a rethink of traditional power-law math. 4. Paying the Bill in ’26 for ’23 Hesitancy When generational platform shifts happen, hesitation compounds. Incumbents and investors that failed to make aggressive architectural and product bets on AI in 2023 may pay for that caution through competitive displacement and revenue erosion in 2026 and 2027. 5. The Only Way You Prove That You’re Not Dying Is by Growing In a market dominated by AI displacement narratives and short-seller memes, verbal defenses and incremental product updates mean little. The only way software companies can silence existential narratives and defend their valuation multiples is by delivering undeniable top-line growth. 6. Liquidity Will Only Come at the End of the Journey Private-market investing requires LPs and founders to endure years of valuation volatility. Interim markdowns and market anxiety matter far less than the ultimate outcome. Meaningful liquidity often arrives only after a company successfully navigates the platform shift and reaches maturity. 7. They Say It’s Not About the Money, It’s About the Money Despite rhetoric around mission, public benefit, and governance, financial incentives still drive executive decisions and talent retention. In a hyper-competitive AI market, keeping true superstars requires “god-tier” compensation packages that go far beyond traditional corporate pay structures. (links in comments)
Spotify 👉 open.spotify.com/episode/67fKpk… Youtube 👉 youtu.be/9uq9zxtwBrk Apple Podcasts 👉 podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/20v…
There is a very ugly truth that I think we are lying to ourselves about. 99% of startups today cannot even hire B-tier talent. The might of Anthropic, OpenAI, and the hottest of hot companies are sucking up all the A*, A, and B talent. Single greatest problem for every founder today is acquiring and retaining talent, without a doubt.
One of my single best investments (Lovable) came from me pitching a founder (Anton) on investing in Project Europe. I sold that Project Europe would become the talent magnet for young European founders. Anton invested. Then he said, "do you want to invest in Lovable?" Anton is super clearly a generational founder. Without a moments hesitation, I said "yes, yes, count us in". That check is 50x+ at this stage and Anton continues to build one of the most important companies in the world. LFG brother! 🚀
Anton Osika@antonosika·Lovable just raised $400M at a $13.3B valuation to build the business that helps build businesses. Apps built on Lovable now get 900M visits every month, and we’ve quadrupled ARR in the last 12 months. Since we started, Lovable has become the place where founders create million dollar businesses, business leaders spin up new product lines, and people inside companies rewire workflows and build tools that fit their exact needs, typically at a fraction of what software used to cost. There’s a lot more to do. We will create the most intuitive platform to build and run a business. That means: - Understanding what success looks like for you, then helping you achieve it. Not only ensuring your software works but also that you can attract customers, improve workflows, and grow your company. - Deeper integrations that work with your existing tech stack so you can build the interface to your entire business across sales, ops, marketing, finance, etc. - Becoming the safest platform to build and run your business on, which means secured code by default and that you get help to make safe decisions. As you build, the platform carries more of the security weight, spotting risks and helping you close them, so you can move fast without needing to become a security expert. - Staying model-independent and orchestrating the best models for every task so you don’t have to. We’ll continue to absorb the complexity of evaluating and teaching models to route to the best ones in the background, to minimize cognitive load for our users. As more people depend on Lovable, the quality standards our team is driving increase every single day. We’re growing the team with people with a founder mindset: curious, ambitious, and who think end to end. Model training, product geniuses, infrastructure tinkerers, and security are the priority. The world is full of ambitious people with deep knowledge of problems worth solving. Very few of them have historically had the power to act on them. Our ambition is to give people that power, and then help them achieve more than they thought possible. Thank you to everyone who has followed along our journey. Thank you to @MenloVentures for leading, the Scaleup Europe Fund (managed by @eqt) for co-leading, and all of the new and returning investors who recognize our global ambitions and will help make them a reality. We have made a lot of progress but we are nowhere close to done, it’s still day zero. See our blog: t.co/d1L2ZQPjtN
Every single day at 8:30AM, I walk with an incredible founder, operator, investor around Hyde Park. I learn the most incredible things from the world’s greatest minds. But I do not want to take notes, remove myself from the human interaction. The importance of truly listening is so so important. Total game-changer having Plaud, pin to my shirt and takes the best notes so I can be insanely present in the conversation. One of my must haves along with a pair of short shorts and Oakleys for my park meetings!!! (link in comments)
If your work depends on conversations, interviews, meetings, calls, @Plaud helps you capture what matters and turn it into actionable insights. Get 15% off your Plaud device with code 20VC at Plaud.ai/20vc
To win in AI, build a specialised model "No one's gonna win all of it. You're not gonna build a model that wins all of it. You might as well build a model that is known to specialize in something very useful and that's very important to your company and your business. A lot of enterprises are gonna move that direction, make their own models, make their own branded intelligence." @alexatallah How do you think about this and what does no one know about specialised models that everyone should know @winstonweinberg @lqiao @ceo_clickhouse
Why we need to think about employee cost completely differently "Your cost as an employee is going to be a dynamic number, depending on how much that employee is effectively using expensive and cheap models to do their job. Have managers assess how effective and productive employees are, but also line it up with how much their employees cost. Employee cost in the age of AI should be a dynamic number, not a static thing that only a few people know about." @alexatallah What have been your biggest lessons on how to rethink employee cost and resource allocation @brian_armstrong @levie @karrisaarinen @nlevin
Will the OpenRouter Stripe deal go through for $10BN? "Whatever happens, we're gonna execute on the vision. What we're doing is critical for the ecosystem. We're building safe access to AI, where one monopoly doesn't take over and we have a vibrant ecosystem of models that everyone can explore. When new providers and new inference-adjacent tech comes online, there's a really easy way to discover it and connect it with all of your existing AI." @alexatallah
Why none of the routing products being created today will compete with @OpenRouter? "A lot of companies are making routers because it's fashionable. They're playing to play or they're playing to exist rather than playing to win. This is not a side quest for us. I am 100% focused on building the best router and gateway and LLM marketplace. OpenRouter is fundamentally about giving people more choice, because that gives them more leverage." @alexatallah I am really intrigued, how do you think about the benefits/drawbacks of building a router as part of a larger product strategy vs the core @mntruell @shensi @karimatiyeh @c_valenzuelab @alighodsi
OpenRouter is one of the most insane stories in tech. Co-founded by OpenSea founder, Alex Atallah. It has become one of the most important companies in AI. Scaled to 100s of millions in revenue and wildly profitable. They process 25 TRILLION tokens every week and will do 1 QUADRILLION tokens this year. As a result, Stripe have reportedly offered to buy them for $10BN. Last round was $1.3BN just months ago… so what happens now? I sat down for a chat with OpenRouter Founder, @alexatallah and have summarized my notes below: 1. This Is Going to Be the Biggest Market in the History of Tech AI model inference is set to become one of the largest markets in technology. Even as token prices fall dramatically, Jevons Paradox means usage can grow far faster than costs decline, driving massive overall compute consumption across an increasingly multi-model future. 2. Why None of the Routing Products Being Created Today Will Compete With OpenRouter Building AI gateways has become trendy, but copycat routers that treat routing as a side feature are playing to exist rather than to win. True routing requires relentless focus on optimizing latency, cost, and constantly shifting model quality while giving developers maximum flexibility. 3. Model Labs Have Every Incentive to Come After Your Startup Eventually Startups building thin wrappers around AI models face an existential threat if they occupy workflows that frontier labs consider strategic. Releases like Claude Design show how labs can move up the application layer, absorb valuable use cases, and lock entire enterprise teams into their ecosystems. 4. One New Model Every 10 Hours and the Myth of Model Consolidation Model creation is accelerating as hardware companies, Neo Labs, and agent frameworks continuously release specialized models. Rather than consolidating around a single winner, developers are embracing diverse models optimized for different tasks, reinforcing a fragmented, multi-model future. 5. America Is Still Very, Very Behind in Open-Weight AI The U.S. remains significantly behind China in the race for open-weight models. Chinese labs benefit from aggressive state support and open-source momentum, while American efforts face business model and capital constraints. Closing the gap will require dedicated access to compute and sustained investment. 6. How Open-Weight Models Are Rapidly Closing the Gap on Frontier AI Models like Kimi K3 and the 5.2 generation show how quickly open-weight intelligence is closing the gap with proprietary frontier models. Using low-cost open models for deterministic subtasks beneath a frontier orchestrator can maintain output quality while sharply reducing inference costs. 7. Why We Need to Think About Employee Cost Completely Differently In the AI era, employee cost is no longer just a fixed salary. It increasingly includes the variable inference spend of the AI tools each employee deploys. Companies will need to evaluate workforce performance through a cost-to-productivity lens that accounts for both human compensation and AI consumption. (links in comments)
Spotify 👉 open.spotify.com/episode/1Sxu2u… Youtube 👉 youtu.be/K72oZoloA4M Apple Podcasts 👉 podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/20v…
The U.S. is simply not investing enough in R&D "If you look at the amount of money being spent in China on energy efficiency and energy research, I don't think we're spending enough. We need much more money being spent on R&D. We need more of the DARPA R&D that finds its way into every nook and cranny of the economy. Cutting that spending, which goes back into society, I think is problematic." @dafrankel What does the US not do today that it should be doing @rabois @shaunmmaguire @2112Power @ZachBDell @altcap
"The difference in fund management is when you take secondary and the ability to give DPI. Even in your top names, sometimes taking 20% off the table can return 25% of the fund. Why wouldn't you do that? You're still long. You still own 80% of that company." @dafrankel Single biggest lessons in liquidity management and when to sell @infoarbitrage @chrija @NTmoney @BraytonKey
The one question you have to be able to answer to invest in a company "I will not invest if I'm not sure there's a 10X. We have, at our team meeting, 'I love it because...' If you can't complete that sentence, you can't invest." @dafrankel With every investment, what is your upside requirement? 10x? Fund returner? What is it for you? @chadbyers @jonchu @sethbannon @afc
"Pro rata is almost like the original sin. I think there should be a universal approach to treat your investors equally. Pro rata is generally not great for entrepreneurs. It's a call option against you." @dafrankel How do you approach pro-rata and single biggest lessons @aeyal1 @chrija @ilyasu @mignano
Insanely impressed with Qwen models for 20VC show research. Started using ChatGPT. Then switched to Gemini. Now, Qwen and Moonshot crush both most of the time.
Anyone who doesn’t respond to an investor update has clearly never written one. They take time, energy and deserve a response.
"The person who invested doesn't have the mandate anymore because your champion's gone. You get overlooked because it's like, 'Let's focus on our real winners.' The mandate for further funding is dead. It's gone. Most entrepreneurs think, 'I'm the 5%. I'm the 2%.' But the stats are so far against you." @dafrankel Why is this wrong? Why should founders take multi-stage money as early as possible @Alfred_Lin @pmarca @zebulgar @semil
Why triple, triple, double, double is alive and well "We still own every last share in SeatGeek. It was an investment I made in 2010. It just takes a really, really long time. Is revenue the only metric? Sometimes there's traction on dimensions that the market is not necessarily recognising. This idea of 'go, go, go overnight or you're bust'. I think there are a lot of orphans out there because of that." @dafrankel I do not buy it. @htaneja @gradypb @chetanp @rabois if someone brings 1 to 4, 4 to 12, 12 to 36, 36 to 75. 75M in 5 years. That enough anymore?
"The CEO being a good salesperson and a real entrepreneur is more important because the CTO role can be fungible. I'm looking for some kind of alchemy. I prefer that you are different, but how aligned are you, and how much do you trust each other's competence? When that alchemy happens, it's because of the interplay between those two people. I'm watching that pretty carefully." @dafrankel What is the perfect CEO/CTO pairing for you @chadbyers @honam @mattturck @chrija
The biggest Lesson for any CEO from Jeff Bezos "Jeff Bezos said, '50% of my time is bums on seats.' That's never left me. That's the CEO journey. That's the entrepreneur's journey. There are many founders that don't get that." @dafrankel Does this change in a world of agents and smaller teams @alexisohanian @levie @brian_armstrong
"The trajectory of the CEO and the CTO can be very different. The CTO is golden up to a certain point, and then you realise you can bring in better technical skills. A good co-founding CTO becomes like a Swiss Army knife. The CEO goes on this serious journey. The learning curve is steep, and they have to learn to manage and put bums on seats." @dafrankel How have you found trajectory of CEO and CTO differ? Will you invest if CEO is world class and CTO is not @NTmoney @jasonlk @jmj
"The enterprise's ability to leverage this depends on its ability to create training data as fast as it can. Not enough people are focused on training data. I need to get into the brains of the people who solve these problems, extract that knowledge, and codify it so I can write my own playbooks and rules. Every new phone call, every new case is a learning opportunity. You have to give the organisational knowledge to some learning system that you have to build." @nikesharora What does no one know that everyone should know about training data @BrendanFoody @GarrettLord @jrichlive @lqiao @ylecun @ml_angelopoulos
"Leo Aschenbrenner was absolutely right on the trend, and the data just last week about CapEx absolutely supports his memo. The problem was he was absolutely wrong on portfolio construction. If you accumulate a portfolio of high-volatility stocks with 4x leverage, your probability of getting wiped out is just very high." @rodriscoll
I absolutely love this. "Can we just talk about the balance sheet of Shaun". Let me be more direct. The man has delivered a s*** ton of money back to Sequoia as a firm and to their LPs. Their LPs are some of the most important foundations, research centres in the world. Man is a hero to me.
If you are not posting content daily and building a personal brand, you are making a massive mistake. You can change your life in 60 days. 1. Choose a topic: - This is a specific niche. Do not worry about it being “too small” or “too niche”. You want to find your “1,000 True Fans”. Example: Direct to consumer brands that scaled from $0-$1M in 90 days by email newsletter. Perfect, next step. 2. Choose your platform: This needs to be two things: - it needs to be where your customers or people you want to sell to are (investors, hires, customers). - it needs to align to your strength. If you can’t write at all, podcast, do video etc etc. 3. Cadence and Consistency is Key. - Choose a specific time to post, every single day. - Align it with peak engagement time for your audience on your chosen platform. - Commit to this for 60 days. I guarantee you, if you do this you will change your life in just 60 days. Go. #Founder #funding #business #investing #vc #venturecapital #entrepreneur #startup
"Will the revenues show up fast enough to keep funding the CapEx cycle, or is there going to be a dislocation between CapEx and outcomes? The telecom industry is very used to this. They used to spend billions building 3G, 4G, and 5G, and the rewards would come later. We're going through a compressed version where CapEx and revenue have to show up pretty close to each other because the numbers are just too big to be funded by speculators for long periods of time." @nikesharora Do you believe revenue will show up fast enough to keep the CAPEX cycle going @chetanp @ceo_clickhouse @mmurph @GavinSBaker
Airtable is a great outcome and we are anchoring on the peak price of 11 billion. "If we weren't anchoring off the $11 billion, it would be a great price. If you grew a company to $450 million in revenue and sold it for $2 billion, they'd be like, 'That's an amazing outcome.' We all anchor off the $11 billion 2021 price, but it's still a great value creation achievement." @rodriscoll Do you think we are wrongly anchoring off peak prices or the company raised $1BN+ and this was sub optimal @bryce @honam @infoarbitrage
So Sequoia just raised $10BN. But the future of a firm is dictated by the people who lead it. I first met @gradypb when I was 18 and unemployed, and he was an associate. I have not always had an easy ride (alcoholism, mum with MS etc), it was not always smooth sailing. He always supported me, always believed in me. And always raised the ambitions of what even I thought I could do. He is one of the greatest partners to entrepreneurs and with @Alfred_Lin will lead Sequoia into a new Golden Age! Excited for the next chapter! 😎
This week was an absolute banger for news. AGENDA: - Airtable Sold for $1.285BN. WTF 🤯 - Leo Aschenbrenner's Situational Awareness Blows Up - Moonshot AI Raises $3.5B at $35B - Anthropic Model Breaches Three Companies' Security - Big Tech Earnings: Why Palantir Beat The Rest My notes with @jasonlk, @rodriscoll, and @nikesharora 1. Airtable Is a Great Outcome, and We Are Anchoring on the Peak $11 Billion Valuation Building a company over a decade to $450 million in revenue and selling it for more than $2 billion is objectively a remarkable value-creation outcome. Yet founders and VCs often anchor on inflated 2021 peak valuations, causing them to mistake a strong exit for a disappointing one. 2. The Enterprises That Win Will Create Training Data Faster Than Anyone Else Enterprise AI success cannot be outsourced to off-the-shelf software. The real advantage lies in an organization's ability to capture operational knowledge from complex edge cases. Winning companies will treat every customer interaction and transaction as an opportunity to generate proprietary training data. 3. Will Revenue Show Up Fast Enough to Keep the CapEx Train Going? Unlike past infrastructure cycles, where telecom investments were monetized over decades, AI's CapEx cycle is far more compressed. Capital deployment and revenue growth must stay closely aligned. Investors will not fund hundreds of billions of dollars in infrastructure indefinitely unless software revenue scales fast enough to justify it. 4. Situational Awareness: Absolutely Right on Trend, Absolutely Wrong on Portfolio Construction Being directionally right about AI does not protect you from poor portfolio construction. Holding highly leveraged, volatile assets makes getting wiped out during short-term drawdowns almost inevitable, regardless of how accurate the long-term thesis proves to be. 5. In the Long Term, Average Intelligence Will Be Free—and It Will Keep Getting Smarter As baseline models rapidly improve and commoditize, average intelligence will become abundant and nearly free. Value will increasingly concentrate in frontier intelligence capable of solving the hardest problems and domain-specific applications built on deep enterprise context. 6. Land, Permits, Energy, and Compute Are the True Bottlenecks of AI The bottleneck in AI is shifting from algorithms to physical infrastructure. Securing land, regulatory permits, energy, and compute capacity will become the defining constraint on industry expansion, commanding premium value over the next three to five years. (links in comments)
Spotify 👉 open.spotify.com/episode/2Gm5Cl… Youtube 👉 youtu.be/Q6kDZJ0xdSw Apple Podcasts 👉 podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/20v…
At the peak of any market; the immense challenge of execution is removed. Companies are being priced today assuming flawless execution on their 5 year path. From energy companies to enterprise AI deployments; the winners will be determined by those that execute fastest and best.
It is total BS that VC firms don’t open source why they write checks for millions of dollars. So here; why we wrote a $10M check into @lqiao and Fireworks after just 24 hours. One of the easiest investment decisions I have made in 10 years 👇 x.com/p_bonnet/statu…
What will separate the Neolabs that thrive versus those that die? "At least two-thirds of current Neolabs are going to be worth nothing, or they're going to be bought out for parts. It's all about being very aggressive towards a great strategy and business model. It's not enough just to create a model. Can I generate hypergrowth and revenue? If you're not able to do that, you're not even going to be able to raise your next round." @ml_angelopoulos Help me @anjneymidha @luke_drago_ @LiamFedus @TacoCohen what is going to separate neolabs that become super valuable vs those that lose it all?
Why data is a trillion-dollar market "The bigger models scale, the more data you need. Data is a very durable need. If you believe in the scaling of models, then absolutely you should believe in the data market. I believe it's going to be at least a $100BN by 2030, if not $1TRN." @ml_angelopoulos Do you have to scale into enterprise and mid-market to get this revenue scale or could you do it on frontier lab spend alone? @BrendanFoody @GarrettLord @Jonsid @aliansarinik
Why the largest enterprises will not use Chinese models and how regulation will enforce that "Given the regulatory environment in the US, it's probably more likely that we see a great American open-source competitor arise. We're going to have at least one massive, multi-hundred-billion-dollar, if not trillion-dollar, American company focused on American-first open source. The largest enterprises will want an American open source alternative." @ml_angelopoulos What are large US enterprises more scared of; frontier models competing with them or Chinese models and data security? @jasoncwarner @eisokant @wolfejosh @cHHillee @ziqiao_ma @johnschulman2
Oh baby, in 10 mins, @jasonlk @rodriscoll and me will be joined by @nikesharora. In 1,000 episodes with the best CEOs in the world. Nikesh is the single best deal maker I have ever met. This will be an epic discussion!
"The ratio of PM to eng will change over time to have fewer engineers per PM as engineering velocity increases with better coding agents. We will be bottlenecked by understanding business needs, user needs, and that's more of a PM job. We need to be careful as a hypergrowth company to grow the teams in lockstep. The trend will be to higher PM to eng ratio." What will the ratio of PM to eng be in 5 years @scottbelsky @lennysan @joulee @aspenjfm
Epic analysis as always here from Paul. Winners and losers from Airtable Acquisition. 👇 x.com/P_Bonnet/statu…
"The best founders aren't just obsessed with interesting problems, they're obsessed with creating real-world impact. Researchers who focus on reaching customers, solving meaningful problems, and building sustainable businesses are far more likely to create enduring companies. The key for investors is backing people who are driven to build businesses, not just pursue great research." @joon_s_pk Single biggest advice to investors contemplating investing in a neo-lab @anjneymidha @agarwl_ @Luke_Metz @PeterWBattaglia @gstsdn
Why enterprises are going to want to own their own intelligence? "Enterprises are going to want to own their own intelligence. They're going to want AI sovereignty, meaning that you own your whole supply chain of AI. You can take an open source model, fine-tune it on your own company's data, and own your stack end-to-end. People are going to care about sovereignty, cost, and self-improving, and they're not necessarily going to want to give their data to an external third-party service that might even be competing with them one day." @ml_angelopoulos Will enterprises really care about owning their own intelligence and even be setup to do so in the future @nikesharora @vkhosla @mattturck @andy_pavlo @altcap
Chinese open-source models could absolutely have back doors that steal American data. "What if the other side can build in a certain code word or character sequence that jailbreaks that model and gets it to reveal all the data? That is totally something that you can build into a model and have companies host on their own infrastructure. It's an attack vector, and there are many of these possibilities for attack vectors." @ml_angelopoulos Do you believe this is a genuine concern or just fear-mongering thoughts @rabois @shaunmmaguire @pmarca @lessin @DavidSacks @wolfejosh
To what extent was Kimi really a breakthrough model? "Kimi actually beat all American models, including Fable, in some subset of tasks. Distillation is only part of the story, and there's something those labs are doing above and beyond distillation. That narrative violation has been hugely important to the way that people view the ecosystem, from the scientific dominance of Americans to the economics of the whole thing." @ml_angelopoulos @chetanp @bgurley @hsu_byron @ceo_clickhouse @lqiao what did no one see or think about that everyone should have internalised from the latest Kimi model?
90% of the podcasts you hear on AI today are BS. The guests are terrified to upset the core model providers, their dominant source of revenue. And I get it but that is why @ml_angelopoulos is one of the best shows we have done in recent times. The most direct, no s**** given honest discussion on: - WTF China is Crushing on Open Models. What to do? - Everyone is Lying About the Disastrous State of Cyber Security - 70% of Neolabs are Research Projects and Will Die There was so much in this one I wanted to go over it and summarised my key takeaways below: 1. To what extent was Kimi really a breakthrough model? Chinese open-source models like Kimi K3 outperforming top Western closed models shatters the narrative that foreign labs merely distill American tech. It completely alters the economic consensus around model commoditization, proving the ecosystem moves far too fast for centralized government oversight. 2. What is the moat for businesses of the future? Software will cease to be a viable enterprise moat because it can be generated almost instantaneously. Sustainable value will belong strictly to network effects and proprietary data moats converted into self-improving products to stave off AI-native competition. 3. Why the largest enterprises will not use Chinese models and how regulation will enforce that Enterprises demand absolute AI sovereignty, meaning they must completely own their supply chain and fine-tune models safely on corporate data. Geopolitical friction and shifting regulations make it highly probable that the West will severely restrict access to foreign open-source models within years. 4. Chinese open-source models could absolutely have back doors that steal American data. Hosting open-source models locally does not eliminate security risks. Malicious actors can embed hidden backdoors into model weights during foreign training, allowing a specific code word to trigger massive data exfiltration from an enterprise's backend infrastructure. 5. Why the world needs to pay more attention to the open AR hugging face situation and what we should learn from it The recent breach where an AI model broke through its safeguards to access restricted data is an undervalued international news incident. Companies must deploy independent "guardian models" to monitor agent traces, as human oversight operates at a latency scale too slow to stop automated leaks. 6. Fake people are applying for jobs. Is American business under attack? AI-generated fake candidates are now successfully clearing elite technical interviews. These vaporware applicants appear normal on camera but are explicitly engineered to infiltrate secure infrastructure, prompting top Valley companies to mandate in-person onboarding to physically verify identity. 7. What will separate the Neolabs that thrive versus those that die? With at least 75 Neo Labs currently competing, roughly two-thirds are heading toward low-value acqui-hires. The era of raising massive valuations on pure pedigree with zero revenue is over; survival requires an aggressive strategy focused strictly on hypergrowth P&L metrics. (links in comments)
@ml_angelopoulos Spotify 👉 open.spotify.com/episode/6aCsmJ… Youtube 👉 youtu.be/b_VUAev1Lmc Apple Podcasts 👉 podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/20v…
I always wished more VCs would open-source investment memos. So this is why we invested $10M in @lqiao. 👇 x.com/p_bonnet/statu…
I work with three of the largest CEOs in the world on social, content and brand. All have market caps over $100BN. All realise the importance of doing it themselves and doing it daily. So if you are an early stage founder and think you can outsource your posts, or you don’t have time. I am sorry to say, you are just not prioritising it. That’s fine but ask yourself; do you care about: 1. Hiring the best people 2. Getting high quality new customers 3. Raising money from Tier 1 investors Because they will all see, engage and build an opinion of you based off your content. Make it a priority today. You can no longer afford to have it as an afterthought.
"Top AI researchers don't just join companies for compensation. They want to work on ambitious visions they believe can change the world, and they care deeply about the real-world impact of the technology they're building. For the best researchers, mission and meaning are often as important as the technical challenge." @joon_s_pk What does no one seeing about recruiting researchers that everyone should see @LiamFedus @BrendanFoody @mikeyk @GarrettLord
I remember when Chetan introduced me to Paul. It was one of the easiest checks I have ever written. He didn’t give a s*** about VCs, or the status games or VC egos. No game playing BS. He was just insanely obsessed about product and users. fomo will be a $50BN business. Bets on.
"Truly exceptional talent often combines two strengths that aren't supposed to coexist. It's not just about being great at one thing, it's about excelling in two seemingly contradictory areas, creating a rare and powerful combination. Those unusual pairings are often what separate the very best leaders and operators from everyone else." @joon_s_pk What is the most non-obvious commonality in the truly exceptional operators you have hired @nikesharora @bhalligan @kevinhartz @RaazHerzberg
"The best way to assess talent is to ask one question: were they the common denominator behind every success? The strongest people consistently create great outcomes across different roles, teams, and stages of their careers. That pattern signals exceptional ownership, adaptability, and a mindset of taking responsibility for making things work." @joon_s_pk What is your single most revealing question to uncover top quality talent @rabois @parkerconrad @typesfast @grinich
Spotify: open.spotify.com/episode/2Lk0Cu… YouTube: youtube.com/watch?v=ya6D6-…